Academic Unit of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J Pathol Clin Res. 2024 Jul;10(4):e12385. doi: 10.1002/2056-4538.12385.
Colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Significant variation in response to treatment and survival is evident among patients with similar stage disease. Molecular profiling has highlighted the heterogeneity of colorectal cancer but has had limited impact in daily clinical practice. Biomarkers with robust prognostic and therapeutic relevance are urgently required. Ideally, biomarkers would be derived from H&E sections used for routine pathological staging, have reliable sensitivity and specificity, and require minimal additional training. The biomarker targets would capture key pathological features with proven additive prognostic and clinical utility, such as the local inflammatory response and tumour microenvironment. The Glasgow Microenvironment Score (GMS), first described in 2014, combines assessment of peritumoural inflammation at the invasive margin with quantification of tumour stromal content. Using H&E sections, the Klintrup-Mäkinen (KM) grade is determined by qualitative morphological assessment of the peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate at the invasive margin and tumour stroma percentage (TSP) calculated in a semi-quantitative manner as a percentage of stroma within the visible field. The resulting three prognostic categories have direct clinical relevance: GMS 0 denotes a tumour with a dense inflammatory infiltrate/high KM grade at the invasive margin and improved survival; GMS 1 represents weak inflammatory response and low TSP associated with intermediate survival; and GMS 2 tumours are typified by a weak inflammatory response, high TSP, and inferior survival. The prognostic capacity of the GMS has been widely validated while its potential to guide chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a large phase 3 trial cohort. Here, we detail its journey from conception through validation to clinical translation and outline the future for this promising and practical biomarker.
结直肠癌仍然是全球主要的死亡原因。具有相似疾病阶段的患者对治疗的反应和生存存在显著差异。分子谱分析突出了结直肠癌的异质性,但在日常临床实践中影响有限。迫切需要具有稳健预后和治疗相关性的生物标志物。理想情况下,生物标志物将源自用于常规病理分期的 H&E 切片,具有可靠的灵敏度和特异性,并且需要最小的额外培训。生物标志物靶标应捕获具有经过验证的附加预后和临床实用性的关键病理特征,例如局部炎症反应和肿瘤微环境。格拉斯哥微环境评分(GMS)于 2014 年首次描述,它结合了评估肿瘤周围炎症在侵袭性边界处的情况,并对肿瘤基质含量进行定量。使用 H&E 切片,通过定性评估肿瘤周围淋巴细胞浸润在侵袭性边界处和肿瘤基质百分比(TSP)的形态学来确定 Klintrup-Mäkinen(KM)分级,TSP 以半定量方式计算为可见视野内基质的百分比。由此产生的三个预后类别具有直接的临床相关性:GMS 0 表示在侵袭性边界处具有密集炎症浸润/高 KM 分级和改善生存的肿瘤;GMS 1 表示炎症反应弱和 TSP 低,与中等生存相关;GMS 2 肿瘤的特点是炎症反应弱、TSP 高和生存不良。GMS 的预后能力已得到广泛验证,其在大型 3 期试验队列中指导化疗的潜力也已得到证明。在这里,我们详细介绍了它从概念到验证再到临床转化的历程,并概述了这个有前途和实用的生物标志物的未来。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014-12-3
J Cancer Res Ther. 2023-4
J Pathol Inform. 2023-1-20
Cancer Discov. 2022-1