Barra Salvina, Belgioia Liliana, Marcenaro Michela, Callegari Serena, Pastorino Alice, Trapani Luca, Cavagnetto Francesca, Garelli Stefania, Corvò Renzo
Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Mar 12;10:473-480. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S146131. eCollection 2018.
After radical prostatectomy (RP) radiotherapy (RT) plays a role, both as adjuvant or salvage treatment. If negative features are present such as extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph invasion, and positive surgical margins, RT after RP reduces the risk of recurrence, although it is associated with an increased risk of acute and late toxicities. An intensified RT delivered in a shortened time could improve clinical outcome and be safely combined with hormonal therapy (HT). The aim of this study was to determine the acute and late toxicities associated with hypofractionated RT and to assess the impact of the addition of HT to RT in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients on overall response and toxicity.
Sixty-four PC patients undergoing RP were included in this retrospective study. All patients were recommended to receive adjuvant or salvage RT. Prescription doses were 62.5 Gy in 25 fractions to prostate bed, 56.25 Gy in 25 fractions to seminal vesicles bed, and 50 Gy in 25 fractions to pelvis if indicated. HT was administered to patients with additional adverse pathologic features including Gleason score >7, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL before surgery, or prostate-specific antigen with rapid doubling time after relapse or nodal involvement. After completion of RT, patients were observed after 4 weeks, and then followed-up every 3-6 months. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, respectively.
For acute toxicity, only grade 1 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were detected in 17% and 11% of patients, respectively. As regards late toxicity, only 5% of the patients developed grade 1 gastrointestinal adverse event; grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 5%, 3.3%, and 3.3% of patients, respectively. Two and 5 years overall survival were 98% and 96%, respectively. The curves stratified for treatment show a slight difference between patients receiving RT or RT+HT, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (=0.133).
In patients with PC undergoing RP, hypofractionated RT may contribute to achieve a high overall survival with an acceptable toxicity profile. Combination of RT and HT is also well tolerated and efficacious.
在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后,放疗(RT)作为辅助或挽救性治疗发挥着作用。如果存在诸如包膜外侵犯、精囊侵犯、淋巴结侵犯和手术切缘阳性等不良特征,RP后的RT可降低复发风险,尽管其与急性和晚期毒性风险增加相关。在较短时间内进行的强化放疗可改善临床结局,并可安全地与激素治疗(HT)联合使用。本研究的目的是确定与大分割放疗相关的急性和晚期毒性,并评估在高危前列腺癌(PC)患者中,放疗联合HT对总体反应和毒性的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了64例行RP的PC患者。所有患者均被建议接受辅助或挽救性放疗。如果有指征,前列腺床的处方剂量为62.5 Gy,分25次;精囊床为56.25 Gy,分25次;盆腔为50 Gy,分25次。对具有额外不良病理特征的患者给予HT,这些特征包括 Gleason评分>7、术前前列腺特异性抗原>20 ng/mL,或复发或淋巴结受累后前列腺特异性抗原快速倍增时间。放疗结束后,患者在4周后进行观察,然后每3 - 6个月随访一次。分别使用不良事件通用术语标准第4版和放射治疗肿瘤学组量表评估急性和晚期毒性。
对于急性毒性,仅分别在17%和11%的患者中检测到1级胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统毒性。至于晚期毒性,仅5%的患者出现1级胃肠道不良事件;1级、2级和3级泌尿生殖系统毒性分别记录在5%、3.3%和3.3%的患者中。2年和5年总生存率分别为98%和96%。按治疗分层的曲线显示,接受放疗或放疗 + HT的患者之间存在轻微差异,但差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.133)。
在接受RP的PC患者中,大分割放疗可能有助于实现较高的总生存率,且毒性可接受。放疗与HT联合使用也耐受性良好且有效。