Suppr超能文献

从应试者的角度看:多维迫选与评分量表工具中的作答过程和测试动机。

Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments.

机构信息

University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):572-584. doi: 10.1177/1073191118762049. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Abstract

The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed as an alternative to the rating scale (RS) response format. However, it is unclear how changing the response format may affect the response process and test motivation of participants. In Study 1, we investigated the MFC response process using the think-aloud technique. In Study 2, we compared test motivation between the RS format and different versions of the MFC format (presenting 2, 3, 4, and 5 items simultaneously). The response process to MFC item blocks was similar to the RS response process but involved an additional step of weighing the items within a block against each other. The RS and MFC response format groups did not differ in their test motivation. Thus, from the test taker's perspective, the MFC format is somewhat more demanding to respond to, but this does not appear to decrease test motivation.

摘要

多维强迫选择(MFC)格式已被提议作为评分量表(RS)响应格式的替代方案。然而,目前尚不清楚改变响应格式如何影响参与者的响应过程和测试动机。在研究 1 中,我们使用出声思维技术研究了 MFC 的响应过程。在研究 2 中,我们比较了 RS 格式和 MFC 格式的不同版本(同时呈现 2、3、4 和 5 个项目)之间的测试动机。MFC 项目块的响应过程与 RS 响应过程相似,但涉及到在块内对项目进行相互权衡的额外步骤。RS 和 MFC 响应格式组在测试动机方面没有差异。因此,从应试者的角度来看,MFC 格式的响应要求略高,但这似乎不会降低测试动机。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验