• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线性因素分析瑟斯顿迫选模型:现状与问题

Linear Factor Analytic Thurstonian Forced-Choice Models: Current Status and Issues.

作者信息

Jansen Markus T, Schulze Ralf

机构信息

University of Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):660-690. doi: 10.1177/00131644231205011. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1177/00131644231205011
PMID:39055095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11268391/
Abstract

Thurstonian forced-choice modeling is considered to be a powerful new tool to estimate item and person parameters while simultaneously testing the model fit. This assessment approach is associated with the aim of reducing faking and other response tendencies that plague traditional self-report trait assessments. As a result of major recent methodological developments, the estimation of normative trait scores has become possible in addition to the computation of only ipsative scores. This opened up the important possibility of comparisons between individuals with forced-choice assessment procedures. With item response theory (IRT) methods, a multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has also been proposed to estimate individual scores. Customarily, items to assess different traits are presented in blocks, often triplets, in applications of the MFC, which is an efficient form of item presentation but also a simplification of the original models. The present study provides a comprehensive review of the present status of Thurstonian forced-choice models and their variants. Critical features of the current models, especially the block models, are identified and discussed. It is concluded that MFC modeling with item blocks is highly problematic and yields biased results. In particular, the often-recommended presentation of blocks with items that are keyed in different directions of a trait proves to be counterproductive considering the goal to reduce response tendencies. The consequences and implications of the highlighted issues are further discussed.

摘要

瑟斯顿迫选模型被认为是一种强大的新工具,可用于估计项目和人员参数,同时检验模型拟合度。这种评估方法的目的是减少困扰传统自我报告特质评估的伪装和其他反应倾向。由于最近在方法学上的重大进展,除了计算相对分数外,现在还可以估计规范性特质分数。这为使用迫选评估程序对个体进行比较提供了重要的可能性。利用项目反应理论(IRT)方法,还提出了一种多维迫选(MFC)格式来估计个体分数。通常,在MFC的应用中,用于评估不同特质的项目以组块形式呈现,通常是三个一组,这是一种有效的项目呈现形式,但也是对原始模型的简化。本研究对瑟斯顿迫选模型及其变体的现状进行了全面综述。确定并讨论了当前模型的关键特征,特别是组块模型。研究得出结论,使用项目组块的MFC建模存在很大问题,并会产生有偏差的结果。特别是,考虑到减少反应倾向的目标,经常推荐的呈现具有在特质的不同方向上计分的项目的组块被证明是适得其反的。进一步讨论了突出问题的后果和影响。

相似文献

1
Linear Factor Analytic Thurstonian Forced-Choice Models: Current Status and Issues.线性因素分析瑟斯顿迫选模型:现状与问题
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):660-690. doi: 10.1177/00131644231205011. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.关于瑟斯顿IRT模型的统计及实际局限性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):827-854. doi: 10.1177/0013164419832063. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.探究多维强制选择数据中特质估计的规范性
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1938960. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
4
Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?高维问卷能否解决强制选择反应格式的自比性问题?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):262-289. doi: 10.1177/0013164420934861. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.一种用于强制选择格式的贝叶斯随机块项目反应理论模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):578-603. doi: 10.1177/0013164419871659. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.多维迫选格式特质量表的编制与验证:测试 Thurstonian IRT 方法。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):224-237. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.多维计算机化自适应测试中使用 Thurstonian IRT 模型的多选题的项目选择方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):600-614. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02037-6. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
8
Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory.使用瑟斯顿项目反应理论对单反应格式和强制选择格式工具进行比较。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Feb;79(1):108-128. doi: 10.1177/0013164417752782. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.多维强制选择自适应评估中的题库组装与题目选择
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):294-321. doi: 10.1177/00131644221087986. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.多维组合项目的对数正态自比模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;12:573252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573252. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?高维问卷能否解决强制选择反应格式的自比性问题?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):262-289. doi: 10.1177/0013164420934861. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
A Big Five-Based Multimethod Social and Emotional Skills Assessment: The Mosaic™ by ACT Social Emotional Learning Assessment.基于大五人格的多方法社会情感技能评估:美国大学考试(ACT)社会情感学习评估的Mosaic™
J Intell. 2022 Sep 20;10(4):72. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040072.
3
On the Information Obtainable from Comparative Judgments.
论从比较判断中可获取的信息。
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1439-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09843-z. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model.多维迫选格式中的伪装建模:伪装混合模型。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):773-794. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09818-6. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.探究多维强制选择数据中特质估计的规范性
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):1-29. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1938960. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.采用 Thurstonian D-扩散项目反应模型对二择一式多维强迫选择人格测量及其反应时间进行联合建模。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1091-1107. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01302-5.
7
The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.多维迫选格式特质量表的编制与验证:测试 Thurstonian IRT 方法。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):224-237. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.比较多维迫选格式和评分量表格式的特质估计的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):239-253. doi: 10.1037/pas0000781. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
9
On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.关于瑟斯顿IRT模型的统计及实际局限性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):827-854. doi: 10.1177/0013164419832063. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments.从应试者的角度看:多维迫选与评分量表工具中的作答过程和测试动机。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):572-584. doi: 10.1177/1073191118762049. Epub 2018 Mar 21.