Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):425-434. doi: 10.2319/090317-589.1. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
To compare tooth movement achieved, time required for alignment, root resorption, and alveolar bone thickness changes during initial dental alignment between groups treated with 0.012-inch preformed heat-activated or customized nickel titanium (NiTi) archwires.
Thirty-two subjects (mean age 19.8 ± 1.7 years) with severe crowding of maxillary anterior teeth had premolar extractions and were randomly allocated into control and experimental groups receiving preformed heat-activated and customized NiTi archwires, respectively. Limited field of view cone-beam computed tomographies were taken initially (T) and three months after final alignment (T) to evaluate bone changes. Digital model analysis assessed tooth movement at monthly intervals. Time to achieve alignment was assessed in months. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare changes within and between groups, as appropriate.
Central incisor tooth movement was significantly different (all P ≤ .003) between groups at all time points. T-T showed labial movement (0.75 ± 1.42 mm) in the control group and palatal movement (-0.96 ± 0.41 mm) in the experimental group. The experimental compared to control group showed significantly more canine distal movement (0.60 ± 0.28 mm; P ≤ .049), less labial bone thickness changes ( P ≤ .004), less root resorption of the central and lateral incisors ( P ≤ .007), and a longer time to achieve alignment ( P = .01).
The experimental group exhibited palatal movement of the central incisors, more canine distal movement with less bone thickness changes, and less root resorption but took more time to achieve alignment than the control group.
比较 0.012 英寸预成型热激活或定制镍钛(NiTi)弓丝在初始牙齿排齐期间实现的牙齿移动、排齐所需时间、根吸收和牙槽骨厚度变化。
32 名(平均年龄 19.8 ± 1.7 岁)上颌前牙严重拥挤的患者进行了前磨牙拔牙,并随机分为对照组和实验组,分别接受预成型热激活和定制 NiTi 弓丝治疗。最初(T)和最终排齐后三个月(T)进行有限视野锥形束计算机断层扫描以评估骨变化。数字模型分析评估每月间隔的牙齿移动。以月为单位评估达到排齐所需的时间。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验用于比较组内和组间的变化,视情况而定。
在所有时间点,中切牙的牙齿移动在两组之间均有显著差异(所有 P ≤.003)。T-T 显示对照组中切牙唇向移动(0.75 ± 1.42 mm),实验组中切牙腭向移动(-0.96 ± 0.41 mm)。实验组与对照组相比,犬牙远中移动明显更多(0.60 ± 0.28 mm;P ≤.049),唇侧骨厚度变化更少(P ≤.004),中切牙和侧切牙根吸收更少(P ≤.007),达到排齐所需的时间更长(P =.01)。
实验组中切牙出现腭向移动,犬牙远中移动更多,骨厚度变化更小,根吸收更少,但达到排齐所需的时间比对照组长。