Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.020.
The force applied to the teeth is a variable of orthodontic treatment that can be controlled. Poor control of the applied force can lead to adverse biologic effects as well as undesirable tooth movements. The selected archwire-bracket combination is a primary determining factor in the force level applied to a tooth during orthodontic treatment. The aim of this research was to use an experimental biomechanical setup to measure forces generated during complex orthodontic tooth movements with various archwire-bracket combinations.
The materials consisted of 3 types of 0.022-in slot orthodontic brackets: (1) conventional brackets (Victory Series [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif] and Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo]), (2) self-ligating brackets (SmartClip [3M Unitek] and Time3 [American Orthodontics, Shegoygan, Wis]), and (3) a conventional low-friction bracket (Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]); and 4 archwire types: (1) 0.012-in stainless steel (3M Unitek), (2) 0.0155-in coaxial (Advanced Orthodontics [Näpflein, Düsseldorf, Germany]), (3) 0.012-in Orthonol (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics), and (4) 0.012-in Thermalloy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics). Stainless steel ligatures and elastomeric rings were used. The materials were used in different combinations in a simulated malocclusion that represented a maxillary central incisor displaced 2 mm gingivally (x-axis) and 2 mm labially (z-axis).
The lowest forces were measured when the brackets were combined with either the coaxial or the Thermalloy archwires; the forces ranged from 3.4 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. The highest forces were measured in combination with stainless steel archwires; the forces ranged from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction.
We recommend 0.0155-in coaxial and 0.012-in Thermalloy archwires for leveling and alignment. Elastomeric rings, when used with conventional brackets, increased the force applied to the teeth.
作用于牙齿的力是正畸治疗中可控制的变量。力控制不佳可能导致不良的生物学效应以及不理想的牙齿移动。所选的弓丝-托槽组合是正畸治疗中作用于牙齿的力水平的主要决定因素。本研究旨在使用实验生物力学装置来测量各种弓丝-托槽组合在复杂正畸牙齿移动过程中产生的力。
材料包括 3 种 0.022 英寸槽正畸托槽:(1)传统托槽(Victory 系列[3M Unitek,Monrovia,加利福尼亚]和 Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics,丹佛,科罗拉多]),(2)自结扎托槽(SmartClip [3M Unitek]和 Time3 [American Orthodontics,Shegoygan,威斯康星])和(3)传统低摩擦托槽(Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]);以及 4 种弓丝类型:(1)0.012 英寸不锈钢丝(3M Unitek),(2)0.0155 英寸同轴丝(Advanced Orthodontics [Näpflein,杜塞尔多夫,德国]),(3)0.012 英寸 Orthonol (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics),和(4)0.012 英寸 Thermalloy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics)。使用不锈钢结扎丝和弹性环。这些材料在模拟的错颌中以不同的组合使用,代表了上颌中切牙向牙龈方向移动 2 毫米(x 轴)和向唇侧移动 2 毫米(z 轴)。
当托槽与同轴或 Thermalloy 弓丝组合时,测量到的力最低;在 x 轴方向的力范围为 3.4 ± 0.2 至 0.7 ± 0.1 N,在 z 轴方向的力范围为 4.5 ± 0.3 至 0.5 ± 0.1 N。当与不锈钢弓丝组合时,测量到的力最高;在 x 轴方向的力范围为 6.3 ± 0.3 至 3.0 ± 0.1 N,在 z 轴方向的力范围为 6.3 ± 0.3 至 1.7 ± 0.1 N。
我们建议使用 0.0155 英寸同轴丝和 0.012 英寸 Thermalloy 弓丝进行排齐和整平。当与传统托槽一起使用时,弹性环会增加作用于牙齿的力。