Department of Statistics, School of Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 21;15(4):565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040565.
The assessment of forest ecosystem services can quantify the impact of these services on human life and is the main basis for formulating a standard of compensation for these services. Moreover, the calculation of the indirect value of forest ecosystem services should not be ignored, as has been the case in some previous publications. A low compensation standard and the lack of a dynamic coordination mechanism are the main problems existing in compensation implementation. Using comparison and analysis, this paper employed accounting for both the costs and benefits of various alternatives. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and the Pearl growth-curve method were used to adjust the results. This research analyzed the contribution of each service value from the aspects of forest produce services, ecology services, and society services. We also conducted separate accounting for cost and benefit, made a comparison of accounting and evaluation methods, and estimated the implementation period of the compensation standard. The main conclusions of this research include the fact that any compensation standard should be determined from the points of view of both benefit and cost in a region. The results presented here allow the range between the benefit and cost compensation to be laid out more reasonably. The practical implications of this research include the proposal that regional decision-makers should consider a dynamic compensation method to meet with the local economic level by using diversified ways to raise the compensation standard, and that compensation channels should offer a mixed mode involving both the market and government.
森林生态系统服务的评估可以量化这些服务对人类生活的影响，是制定这些服务补偿标准的主要依据。此外，不应像一些先前的出版物那样忽视森林生态系统服务的间接价值的计算。补偿实施中存在的主要问题是补偿标准低和缺乏动态协调机制。本文通过比较分析，采用了考虑各种替代方案成本和收益的方法。使用层次分析法（AHP）和 Pearl 增长曲线法对结果进行调整。本研究从森林产品服务、生态服务和社会服务三个方面分析了各项服务价值的贡献。我们还分别对成本和收益进行了核算，对核算和评价方法进行了比较，并对补偿标准的实施期限进行了估计。本研究的主要结论包括，任何补偿标准都应从一个地区的收益和成本角度来确定。这里提出的结果可以更合理地确定收益和成本补偿之间的范围。本研究的实际意义在于建议区域决策者应考虑采用动态补偿方法，通过采用多种方式提高补偿标准，满足当地经济水平，并通过市场和政府的混合模式提供补偿渠道。
