The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Alliance Statistics and Data Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Leukemia. 2018 Jun;32(6):1338-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0068-2. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
Thus far, only 5-15% of AML patients aged ≥60 years are cured with chemotherapy. Identification of patients who are less (more) likely to respond to standard chemotherapy might enable early risk stratification toward alternative treatment regimens. We used a next-generation sequencing panel of 80 cancer- and/or leukemia-associated genes to profile molecularly 423 older patients with de novo AML. Using variables identified in multivariable models and co-occurring mutations in NPM1-mutated AML, we classified the patients into good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups for complete remission (CR) attainment, disease-free (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Whereas 81% of good-risk patients (comprising NPM1-mutated patients harboring mutations in chromatin remodeling, cohesin complex, methylation-related, spliceosome, and/or RAS pathway genes, FLT3-TKD, and/or patients without FLT3-ITD) achieved a CR, only 32% of poor-risk patients (with U2AF1, WT1 mutations and/or complex karyotype) did. Intermediate-risk patients had a 50% CR rate. Similarly, using NPM1 co-mutation patterns and SF1 mutation status, we identified patients with favorable DFS and OS 3-year rates of 46% and 45%, respectively. Patients with adverse genetic features had DFS and OS rates of only 2% and 4%. We show that application of our proposed criteria may refine the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification for older patients treated with chemotherapy.
迄今为止,仅有 5-15%的 60 岁以上 AML 患者通过化疗治愈。识别不太(更)可能对标准化疗有反应的患者可能能够实现早期风险分层,以选择替代治疗方案。我们使用了 80 个癌症和/或白血病相关基因的下一代测序面板,对 423 名新诊断的 AML 老年患者进行了分子谱分析。使用多变量模型中确定的变量和 NPM1 突变的 AML 中共同发生的突变,我们将患者分为完全缓解(CR)、无病(DFS)和总生存(OS)的良好、中等和不良风险组。81%的良好风险患者(包括 NPM1 突变患者,其携带染色质重塑、黏合复合物、甲基化相关、剪接体和/或 RAS 通路基因、FLT3-TKD 的突变,以及没有 FLT3-ITD 的患者)达到 CR,而只有 32%的不良风险患者(具有 U2AF1、WT1 突变和/或复杂核型)达到 CR。中间风险患者的 CR 率为 50%。同样,使用 NPM1 共突变模式和 SF1 突变状态,我们确定了具有良好 DFS 和 OS 的患者,其 3 年 DFS 和 OS 率分别为 46%和 45%。具有不良遗传特征的患者的 DFS 和 OS 率仅为 2%和 4%。我们表明,应用我们提出的标准可以细化 2017 年欧洲白血病网络对接受化疗的老年患者的分类。