Singla Smit, Gabriel Emmanuel, Alnaji Raed, Du William, Attwood Kristopher, Nava Hector, Hochwald Steven N, Kukar Moshim
Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Feb;9(1):73-79. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.09.11.
The relationship of complete pathologic response (cPR) with the timing of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is not well defined. We sought to determine if a delay in esophagectomy after nCRT would result in increased likelihood of cPR and improved survival.
This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients treated with nCRT and esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on timing of esophagectomy (≤50 . >50 days) after completion of nCRT. Survival outcomes were compared using standard Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox regression models.
This study included 226 patients (males, 211 and median age, 61 years) for analysis. Fifty-two patients (23%) in the early group (≤50 days) were compared to 174 patients (77%) in the delayed group (>50 days). The two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, comorbid conditions, ECOG status, location, grade, and tumor histology. There was no statistically significant difference in cPR rate between the early and late groups (26.9% . 19.0%, respectively, P=0.24). On multivariable analysis, lower age, absence of signet cell histology, better ECOG status, shorter length of stay and cPR were independent predictors of improved survival. The median follow-up was 52 months (range, 2-110 months), and there was no difference in the median overall survival (OS) between the early and late groups (48.9 . 42.6 months, respectively, P=0.73).
This analysis of a large cohort of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing multi-modality therapy shows that cPR is independent of the timing of esophagectomy. Other considerations for the timing of surgery, including recovery from nCRT and patient performance, may have more relevant roles than cPR when deciding when to perform esophagectomy.
新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后完全病理缓解(cPR)与食管切除术时机的关系尚不明确。我们试图确定nCRT后延迟食管切除术是否会增加cPR的可能性并改善生存。
这是一项对2004年至2014年间接受nCRT和食管切除术的所有患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行的回顾性分析。根据nCRT完成后食管切除术的时机(≤50天,>50天)将患者分为两组。使用标准的Kaplan-Meier曲线比较生存结果,并使用Cox回归模型进行多变量分析。
本研究纳入226例患者(男性211例,中位年龄61岁)进行分析。早期组(≤50天)的52例患者(23%)与延迟组(>50天)的174例患者(77%)进行比较。两组在年龄、性别、合并症、ECOG状态、位置、分级和肿瘤组织学方面相似。早期组和晚期组的cPR率无统计学显著差异(分别为26.9%和19.0%,P = 0.24)。多变量分析显示,年龄较低、无印戒细胞组织学、ECOG状态较好、住院时间较短和cPR是生存改善的独立预测因素。中位随访时间为52个月(范围2 - 110个月),早期组和晚期组的中位总生存期(OS)无差异(分别为48.9个月和42.6个月,P = 0.73)。
对一大批接受多模式治疗的食管癌患者的分析表明,cPR与食管切除术的时机无关。在决定何时进行食管切除术时,手术时机的其他考虑因素,包括从nCRT恢复情况和患者表现,可能比cPR发挥更重要的作用。