• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国男性囚犯样本中 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)的因素结构和建构效度。

Factor structure and construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP) in a sample of Chinese male inmates.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2018 Jul;30(7):882-892. doi: 10.1037/pas0000537. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000537
PMID:29565613
Abstract

The current study examined the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scale (LSRP) in Chinese male inmates (N = 437). The original 2-factor model, the revised 2-factor model, and the 3-factor model were tested through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Additionally, convergent and discriminant validity were examined via correlational and multiple linear regression analyses between LSRP factors and external criterion variables. Results showed that the 3-factor model fit the data better than the 2-factor model. The 3-factor model also showed reasonable convergent and discriminant validity. The findings were consistent with previous studies and suggested that the LSRP can be an effective self-report measure for assessing psychopathy in China. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

本研究考察了 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)在中国男性囚犯中的因素结构、聚合和区别效度(N=437)。通过验证性因子分析(CFA),检验了原始的 2 因素模型、修订的 2 因素模型和 3 因素模型。此外,通过 LSRP 因子与外部标准变量之间的相关和多元线性回归分析,考察了聚合和区别效度。结果表明,3 因素模型比 2 因素模型更适合数据。3 因素模型也表现出了合理的聚合和区别效度。这些发现与以往的研究一致,表明 LSRP 可以作为一种有效的自我报告量表,用于评估中国的精神病态。

相似文献

1
Factor structure and construct validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP) in a sample of Chinese male inmates.中国男性囚犯样本中 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)的因素结构和建构效度。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Jul;30(7):882-892. doi: 10.1037/pas0000537. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
2
Examining the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Levenson self-report psychopathy scale: is the two-factor model the best fitting model?探讨列文森自我报告精神病态量表的因素结构和聚合及区别效度:两因素模型是否是最佳拟合模型?
Personal Disord. 2014 Jul;5(3):289-304. doi: 10.1037/per0000073. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
3
Elaborating on the construct validity of the Levenson self-report psychopathy scale in incarcerated and non-incarcerated samples.详细阐述 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表在监禁和非监禁样本中的建构效度。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Dec;35(6):440-51. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9249-x.
4
Construct Validity of the E-LSRP in a Correctional Sample.《矫正样本中 E-LSRP 的建构效度》。
Assessment. 2022 Dec;29(8):1917-1930. doi: 10.1177/10731911211038619. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Expanded Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in Community and University Samples.考察扩展版列文森自我报告精神病态量表在社区和大学样本中的心理计量学特性。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1606-1622. doi: 10.1177/10731911221109448. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP): A Replication and Extension in Dutch Nonclinical Participants.列文森自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)的因素结构和建构效度:荷兰非临床参与者的复制和扩展。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Sep-Oct;101(5):481-492. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1519830. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
7
Longitudinal Validation of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) Scale in a High-Risk Dutch Community Sample.莱文森自我报告式精神病态量表(LSRP)在荷兰高危社区样本中的纵向效度验证
Assessment. 2022 Apr;29(3):367-384. doi: 10.1177/1073191120975130. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Development and Validation of an Expanded Version of the Three-Factor Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale.三因素莱文森自陈式精神病态量表扩展版的编制与验证
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(2):155-68. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1068176. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
9
Validation of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale in the non-institutionalized Lebanese population.验证 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)在非机构化的黎巴嫩人群中的适用性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05499-4.
10
Evaluating the Construct Validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale in China.评估莱文森自我报告精神病态量表在中国的结构效度。
Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):1008-1023. doi: 10.1177/1073191116637421. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Fast & furious: Rejecting the hypothesis that secondary psychopathy improves reaction time-based concealed information detection.快速且激烈:拒绝二级精神病态改善基于反应时间的隐藏信息检测这一假说。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 15;19(10):e0311948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311948. eCollection 2024.
2
Morality, self-control, age, type of offence and sentence length as predictors of psychopathy amongst female incarcerated offenders in South Africa.道德、自我控制、年龄、犯罪类型和刑期长短对南非女性监禁罪犯的精神病态的预测作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0299847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299847. eCollection 2024.
3
Risky Sexual Behavior and Psychopathy: Testing the Relationship in a Non-Clinical Sample of Young Adults in Hong Kong.
危险的性行为与精神病态:在香港年轻成年人的非临床样本中检验两者关系
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 27;14(2):94. doi: 10.3390/bs14020094.
4
Validation of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale in the non-institutionalized Lebanese population.验证 Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)在非机构化的黎巴嫩人群中的适用性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05499-4.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Sport Anxiety Scale-2.中文版运动焦虑量表-2的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1260253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260253. eCollection 2023.
6
Gun Violence and Psychopathy Among Female Offenders.女性罪犯中的枪支暴力与精神病态
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;13:873305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873305. eCollection 2022.
7
Personality Traits and Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Chinese University Students: The Moderating Role of Internet Self-Efficacy and Gender.中国大学生的人格特质与网络欺凌行为:网络自我效能感和性别的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 22;13:779139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779139. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychopathy facets, perceived power, and forms of aggression.心理变态的各个方面、感知到的权力及攻击形式。
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):259-273. doi: 10.1037/per0000562. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
9
Mentalizing During Social Interaction: The Development and Validation of the Interactive Mentalizing Questionnaire.社交互动中的心理化:互动心理化问卷的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 17;12:791835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.791835. eCollection 2021.
10
Do High Psychopaths Care More about Moral Consequences than Low Psychopaths in Chinese Culture? An Exploration Using the CNI Model.在中国文化中,高精神病态者比低精神病态者更在意道德后果吗?一项使用CNI模型的探究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 21;8(4):505. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040505.