Suppr超能文献

列文森自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)的因素结构和建构效度:荷兰非临床参与者的复制和扩展。

Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP): A Replication and Extension in Dutch Nonclinical Participants.

机构信息

a Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University , Tilburg , The Netherlands.

b Department of Psychology, University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2019 Sep-Oct;101(5):481-492. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1519830. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Abstract

The Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale is widely used to assess psychopathic traits in noninstitutionalized samples. Recent studies suggest that a three-factor structure measuring Egocentricity, Callousness, and Antisocial factors outperformed the original two-factor structure of the LSRP. This study replicated and extended these findings by examining the factor structure and construct validity of a Dutch version of the LSRP in a community sample ( = 856, subsamples ranging between 140 and 572 participants). Confirmatory factor analysis results corroborated the superiority of the three-factor model of the LSRP, using 19 of the 26 LSRP items. Limitations included the need to specify correlated residuals for some indicators, although these were largely in line with prior studies. Across three subsamples, we found evidence for construct validity of the LSRP subscales. Egocentricity and Antisocial showed a pattern of differential associations with external correlates in accordance with theoretical expectations. Callousness shared some correlates with Egocentricity, others with Antisocial, and uniquely predicted low morality and high physical aggression. Few exceptions to the hypothesized associations were observed, mostly concerning Callousness. Overall, the LSRP three-factor model received further support in a Dutch sample, and is thus recommended in future research, possibly adding items to improve the performance of the Callousness factor.

摘要

Levenson 自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)被广泛用于评估非机构化样本中的精神病态特征。最近的研究表明,一种测量自我中心、冷酷和反社会因素的三因素结构优于 LSRP 的原始两因素结构。本研究通过在社区样本(=856,子样本范围在 140 至 572 名参与者之间)中检验 LSRP 的荷兰语版本的因素结构和构念效度,复制并扩展了这些发现。验证性因素分析结果证实了 LSRP 的三因素模型的优越性,使用了 26 个 LSRP 项目中的 19 个。限制包括需要为一些指标指定相关残差,尽管这些残差在很大程度上与先前的研究一致。在三个子样本中,我们发现 LSRP 分量表具有构念效度的证据。自我中心和反社会与外部相关因素的关联模式符合理论预期。冷酷与自我中心有一些共同的相关因素,与反社会有其他的相关因素,并且独特地预测了低道德和高身体攻击性。观察到的假设关联的少数例外,主要涉及冷酷。总体而言,LSRP 的三因素模型在荷兰样本中得到了进一步支持,因此在未来的研究中建议使用,可能需要添加一些项目来提高冷酷因素的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验