1 The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):1008-1023. doi: 10.1177/1073191116637421. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
The Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale is an efficient measure of psychopathy with promising psychometric properties. However, the cross-cultural utility of the LSRP has not been well documented, and no study has explored measurement invariance of the LSRP across East Asian and North American samples. We translated the LSRP into Chinese (Study 1) and investigated the validity and reliability of the Chinese LSRP using a sample of 226 university students in China (Study 2). Confirmatory factor analyses supported Brinkley, Diamond, Magaletta, and Heigel's (2008) three-factor model (Egocentricity, Callousness, and Antisocial). Evidence for configural and partial metric (but not scalar) invariance of the factor structure was observed when comparing Chinese and U.S. university samples. However, response thresholds were significantly different between the two samples. The Chinese LSRP scores also demonstrated encouraging convergent and discriminate validity in terms of their associations with external criteria. We discuss the implications for cross-cultural assessment of psychopathy.
列文森自我报告精神病态量表(LSRP)是一种有效的精神病态测量工具,具有良好的心理测量学特性。然而,LSRP 的跨文化效用尚未得到充分记录,也没有研究探讨 LSRP 在东亚和北美样本中的测量不变性。我们将 LSRP 翻译为中文(研究 1),并使用中国 226 名大学生的样本(研究 2)研究了中文 LSRP 的有效性和可靠性。验证性因素分析支持 Brinkley、Diamond、Magaletta 和 Heigel(2008)的三因素模型(自我中心、冷酷无情和反社会)。在比较中国和美国大学生样本时,观察到因子结构的组态和部分度量(但不是标度)不变性的证据。然而,两个样本之间的反应阈值存在显著差异。中文 LSRP 分数在与外部标准的关联方面也表现出令人鼓舞的聚合和区分效度。我们讨论了跨文化评估精神病态的意义。