a Department of Family Medicine , McMaster University , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada.
b Department of Family and Community Medicine , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):377-385. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1437040. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
: Increasing numbers of medical students from high-income countries are undertaking international medical electives (IMEs) during their training. Much has been written about the benefits of these experiences for the student, and concerns have been raised regarding the burden of IMEs on host communities. The voices of physicians from low- and middle-income countries who supervise IMEs have not been explored in depth. The current study sought to investigate host-physician perspectives on IMEs. : Host supervisors were recruited by convenience sampling through students travelling abroad for IMEs during the summer of 2012. From 2012 through 2014, 11 semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with host supervisors from Nepal, Uganda, Ghana, Guyana, and Kenya. Participants were invited to describe their motivations for hosting IMEs and their experiences of the benefits and harms of IMEs. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and checked for accuracy. An initial coding framework was developed and underwent multiple revisions, after which analytic categories were derived using conventional qualitative content analysis. : For host supervisors, visits from international medical students provided a window into the resource-rich medical practice of high-income countries, and supervisors positioned themselves, their education, and clinical expertise against perceived standards of the international students' context. Hosting IMEs also contributed to supervisors' identities as educators connected to a global community. Supervisors described the challenge of helping students navigate their distress when confronting global health inequity. Finally, the desire for increasingly reciprocal relationships was expressed as a hope for the future. : IMEs can be formative for host supervisors' identities and are used to benchmark host institutions compared with international medical standards. Reciprocity was articulated as essential for IMEs moving forward.
越来越多来自高收入国家的医学生在培训期间参加国际医学实习(IME)。人们已经写了很多关于这些经历对学生的好处的文章,并对 IME 给接待社区带来的负担表示担忧。来自低收入和中等收入国家的监督 IME 的医生的意见尚未得到深入探讨。本研究旨在调查接待医生对 IME 的看法。
通过出国参加 IME 的医学生在 2012 年夏天进行便利抽样,招募接待导师。2012 年至 2014 年期间,通过电话对来自尼泊尔、乌干达、加纳、圭亚那和肯尼亚的接待导师进行了 11 次半结构化访谈。邀请参与者描述他们接待 IME 的动机以及他们对 IME 的好处和危害的经验。访谈内容逐字记录并进行准确性检查。开发了一个初始编码框架,并进行了多次修订,然后使用传统的定性内容分析方法得出分析类别。
对于接待导师来说,国际医学生的来访为他们提供了一个了解高收入国家资源丰富的医疗实践的窗口,导师们将自己、自己的教育和临床专业知识与国际学生所在环境的标准进行对比。接待 IME 也有助于导师作为与全球社区联系的教育者的身份认同。导师们描述了帮助学生在面对全球卫生不平等时应对困境的挑战。最后,他们表达了对未来互惠关系的渴望。
IME 可以对接待导师的身份产生影响,并用于将接待机构与国际医疗标准进行基准比较。互惠被表述为 IME 向前发展的关键。