GENUD Toledo Research Group, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain.
CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Virgen del Valle, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 15;108:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
The actual mechanisms leading to a reduced muscle power and functional ability in older adults are poorly understood. We investigated the association between different force-velocity (F-V) profiles and impaired muscle power, physical and cognitive function, frailty, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older people.
Physical function (habitual gait speed, timed up-and-go test, sit-to-stand and stair-climbing ability), cognitive function, HRQoL and frailty were evaluated in 31 older subjects (70-85 years). The F-V relationship and maximal muscle power (P) were assessed in the leg press exercise. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) and fat index, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time were obtained from DXA scans and accelerometry, respectively.
While some subjects showed a force deficit (F), others presented a velocity deficit (V), both leading to an impaired muscle power [Effect size (ES) = 1.30-1.44], and to a likely-very likely moderate harmful effect in their physical and cognitive function, HRQoL and frailty levels (except the V group for cognitive function) [ES = 0.76-1.05]. Leg muscle mass and specific force were similarly associated with force at P, while MVPA but not sedentary time was related to fat index, force at P, and power values (all p < 0.05). A trend was found for the negative association between fat index and relative P (p = 0.075).
Older subjects exhibited different mechanisms (force vs. velocity deficits) leading to impaired muscle power. Both deficits were associated with a lower physical function and quality of life, and a higher frailty, whereas only a force deficit was associated with a lower cognitive function. Interventions aimed at reversing age- and/or disuse-related impairments of muscle power might evaluate the specific responsible mechanism and act accordingly.
导致老年人肌肉力量和功能下降的具体机制尚不清楚。我们研究了不同力量-速度(F-V)曲线与老年人肌肉力量下降、身体和认知功能、虚弱和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)之间的关系。
评估了 31 名老年人(70-85 岁)的身体功能(习惯性步行速度、计时起立行走测试、坐站和爬楼梯能力)、认知功能、HRQoL 和虚弱程度。在腿部按压运动中评估 F-V 关系和最大肌肉力量(P)。通过 DXA 扫描和加速度计分别获得骨骼肌指数(SMI)和脂肪指数、中高强度体力活动(MVPA)和久坐时间。
虽然一些受试者表现出力量不足(F),而另一些受试者表现出速度不足(V),这两种情况都导致肌肉力量受损[效应大小(ES)= 1.30-1.44],并对身体和认知功能、HRQoL 和虚弱程度产生可能是中度到高度的有害影响(除了 V 组的认知功能)[ES= 0.76-1.05]。腿部肌肉质量和比力量与 P 时的力量同样相关,而 MVPA 而不是久坐时间与脂肪指数、P 时的力量和功率值相关(均 p<0.05)。脂肪指数与相对 P 之间存在负相关的趋势(p=0.075)。
老年受试者表现出不同的机制(力量与速度不足)导致肌肉力量下降。两种不足都与身体功能和生活质量降低以及虚弱程度增加有关,而只有力量不足与认知功能降低有关。旨在逆转与年龄和/或废用相关的肌肉力量下降的干预措施可能会评估特定的责任机制并相应地采取行动。