Kumarakulasingam P, McDermott H, Boutler L, Patel N, Tincello D, Moss E L
Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
National Centre of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, United Kingdom.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
To explore differences in the background knowledge of Endometrial Cancer (EC), its risk factors, symptoms and prognosis of Endometrial Cancer (EC) between British White (BW) and British South Asian (BSA) women who had undergone treatment for stage I endometrial cancer within the past 3-years.
Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews exploring knowledge; diagnosis; treatment; follow-up; and survivorship were undertaken and analysed using Thematic Analysis.
Twenty-one women were interviewed (13 BW and 8 BSA). BW and BSA women reported similar views, experiences and concerns with regards to EC. Knowledge appeared to differ amongst the two groups with BSA women reporting being more aware that unscheduled vaginal bleeding could be associated with a malignancy but having lower levels of knowledge of the risk factors that can lead to EC, compared to BW women. There was a lack of understanding of the difference between cervical cancer and EC and as a result, many women reported taking reassurance from negative cervical cytology as excluding EC. There was also the misconception amongst some of the women that there was a link between sexual behaviour and EC. Women from both groups used the lay healthcare system to discuss their situation/symptoms, however BSA women reported to have specifically sought out women within their social network who had previously undergone treatment for EC.
Greater effort is needed to raise awareness in both the BW/BSA communities of the symptoms associated with EC that should prompt medical review. Educational efforts are required to overcome the reported perception that EC is synonymous with cervical cancer and cannot be detected by cervical screening.
探讨过去3年内接受过I期子宫内膜癌治疗的英国白人(BW)和英国南亚裔(BSA)女性在子宫内膜癌(EC)背景知识、其风险因素、症状及预后方面的差异。
采用面对面的半结构化访谈来探究知识、诊断、治疗、随访及生存情况,并运用主题分析法进行分析。
共访谈了21名女性(13名BW和8名BSA)。BW和BSA女性在EC方面报告了相似的观点、经历和担忧。两组之间的知识水平似乎存在差异,与BW女性相比,BSA女性报告称更清楚非经期阴道出血可能与恶性肿瘤有关,但对可导致EC的风险因素的了解程度较低。对宫颈癌和EC之间的差异缺乏理解,因此,许多女性报告称,因宫颈细胞学检查结果为阴性而放心,认为可排除EC。部分女性中还存在性行为与EC之间有关联的误解。两组女性都利用非专业医疗系统来讨论自己的情况/症状,然而,BSA女性报告称,她们特别向社交网络中之前接受过EC治疗的女性寻求帮助。
需要做出更大努力,提高BW/BSA社区对与EC相关症状的认识,这些症状应促使进行医学检查。需要开展教育工作,以克服报告中提到的那种观念,即认为EC等同于宫颈癌,且无法通过宫颈筛查检测出来。