From the Departments of Neurology (I.L.M., M.S., J.L.).
Neuroradiology (J.R.L., I.T., D.B., K.S., M.K., M.-N.P.), University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):881-886. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5595. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
One-stop management of mechanical thrombectomy-eligible patients with large-vessel occlusion represents an innovative approach in acute stroke treatment. This approach reduces door-to-reperfusion times by omitting multidetector CT, using flat detector CT as pre-mechanical thrombectomy imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the latest-generation flat detector CT with multidetector CT.
Prospectively derived data from patients with ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed in this monocentric study. All included patients underwent multidetector CT before referral to our comprehensive stroke center and flat detector CT in the angiography suite before mechanical thrombectomy. Diagnosis of early ischemic signs, quantified by the ASPECTS, was compared between modalities using cross tables, the Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman plots. The predictive value of multidetector CT- and flat detector CT-derived ASPECTS for functional outcome was investigated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Of 25 patients, 24 (96%) had flat detector CT with sufficient diagnostic quality. Median multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTSs were 7 (interquartile range, 5.5-9 and 4.25-8, respectively) with a mean period of 143.6 ± 49.5 minutes between both modalities. The overall sensitivity was 85.1% and specificity was 83.1% for flat detector CT ASPECTS compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS as the reference technique. Multidetector CT and flat detector CT ASPECTS were strongly correlated ( = 0.849, < .001) and moderately predicted functional outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.738; = .007 and .715; = .069, respectively).
Determination of ASPECTS on flat detector CT is feasible, showing no significant difference compared with multidetector CT ASPECTS and a similar predictive value for functional outcome. Our findings support the use of flat detector CT for emergency stroke imaging before mechanical thrombectomy to reduce door-to-groin time.
对适合机械取栓的大血管闭塞患者进行一站式管理是急性脑卒中治疗的一种创新方法。这种方法通过省略多排 CT,使用平板探测器 CT 作为机械取栓前的影像学检查,从而减少了从患者进入医院到血管再通的时间。本研究的目的是比较最新一代平板探测器 CT 与多排 CT 的诊断性能。
本单中心研究分析了经多排 CT 检查诊断为大血管闭塞性缺血性脑卒中且适合机械取栓的患者前瞻性数据。所有纳入患者在转诊至我们的综合卒中中心前均接受了多排 CT 检查,在机械取栓前在血管造影室接受了平板探测器 CT 检查。使用交叉表、Pearson 相关系数和 Bland-Altman 图比较两种模态的早期缺血征象(ASPECTS)诊断情况。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积分析,研究了多排 CT 和平板探测器 CT 衍生的 ASPECTS 对功能结局的预测价值。
25 例患者中,24 例(96%)患者的平板探测器 CT 检查具有足够的诊断质量。多排 CT 和平板探测器 CT 的中位 ASPECTS 分别为 7 分(四分位距 5.59 分和 4.258 分),两种模态之间的平均时间间隔为 143.6 ± 49.5 分钟。平板探测器 CT ASPECTS 的总体敏感性为 85.1%,特异性为 83.1%,以多排 CT ASPECTS 为参考技术。多排 CT 和平板探测器 CT ASPECTS 具有很强的相关性( = 0.849, <.001),对功能结局的预测能力中等(受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.738、0.715; =.069、0.715)。
平板探测器 CT 上 ASPECTS 的测定是可行的,与多排 CT ASPECTS 相比无显著差异,对功能结局的预测价值相似。我们的研究结果支持在机械取栓前使用平板探测器 CT 进行紧急脑卒中成像,以减少从进入医院到血管再通的时间。