Hamal Mukesh, Dieleman Marjolein, De Brouwere Vincent, de Cock Buning Tjard
1Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences (VU University), De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2ISGlobal, Barcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Public Health Rev. 2018 Mar 16;39:9. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0081-z. eCollection 2018.
There are several studies from different geographical settings and levels on maternal health, but none analyzes how accountability problems may contribute to the maternal health outcomes. This study aimed to analyze how accountability problems in public health system lead to maternal deaths and inequities in India.
A conceptual framework was developed bringing together (in terms of standard setting, performance assessment, accountability (or answerability, and enforceability) -an ongoing cyclical feedback process at different levels of health system) and to analyze the influence of the process on the determinant leading to . A scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies from public health sector in India was conducted. A narrative and interpretive synthesis approach was applied to analyze data.
An overarching influence of health system-related factors over non-health system-related factors leading to maternal deaths and inequities was observed. A potential link among such factors was identified with gaps in accountability functions at all levels of health system pertaining to policy gaps or conflicting/discriminatory policies and political commitment. A large number of gaps were also observed concerning performance or implementation of existing standards. Inherent to these issues was potentially a lack of proper monitoring and accountability functions. A critical role of power was observed influencing the accountability functions.
The narrative and interpretive synthesis approach allowed to integrate and reframe the relevant comparable information from the limited empirical studies to identify the hot spots of systemic flaws from an accountability perspective. The framework highlighted problems in health system beyond health service delivery to wider areas such as policy or politics justifying their relevance and importance in such analysis. A crucial message from the study pertains to a need to move away from the traditional concept of viewing accountability as a blame-game approach and a concern of limited frontline health workers towards a constructive and systemic approach.
有多项来自不同地理区域和层面的关于孕产妇健康的研究,但没有一项分析问责问题如何影响孕产妇健康结果。本研究旨在分析印度公共卫生系统中的问责问题如何导致孕产妇死亡和不平等现象。
构建了一个概念框架,将(在标准设定、绩效评估、问责(或可答复性)和可执行性方面——卫生系统不同层面持续的循环反馈过程)整合在一起,以分析该过程对导致……的决定因素的影响。对印度公共卫生部门的定性和混合方法研究进行了范围审查。采用叙述性和解释性综合方法分析数据。
观察到与卫生系统相关的因素对导致孕产妇死亡和不平等的非卫生系统相关因素具有总体影响。在卫生系统各级的问责职能方面,与政策差距、相互冲突/歧视性政策以及政治承诺相关的这些因素之间发现了潜在联系。在现有标准的绩效或实施方面也观察到大量差距。这些问题的内在原因可能是缺乏适当的监测和问责职能。观察到权力在影响问责职能方面起着关键作用。
叙述性和解释性综合方法有助于整合和重新构建有限实证研究中的相关可比信息,从问责角度识别系统性缺陷的热点问题。该框架突出了卫生系统中超出卫生服务提供范围的更广泛领域(如政策或政治)的问题,证明了它们在此类分析中的相关性和重要性。该研究的一个关键信息是,需要从将问责视为指责游戏的传统观念以及对一线卫生工作者有限关注的观念,转向建设性的系统方法。