Sanna Tommaso, Ziegler Paul D, Crea Filippo
Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Diagnostics Research, Medtronic Inc., Mounds View, Minnesota.
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):426-432. doi: 10.1002/clc.22876. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Cryptogenic stroke (CS) and embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS) represent a major challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly found after CS or ESUS. Independent of the mechanism of the index CS or ESUS, detection of AF in these patients offers the opportunity to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence by prescribing an anticoagulant instead of aspirin. The detection of AF may be pursued with different monitoring strategies. Comparison of monitoring strategies should take into account that AF detection rates reported in published studies, and then pooled in meta-analyses, are not only a function of the monitoring strategy itself, but also depend on patient-related, device-related, and study design-related factors. Once AF is found, the decision to anticoagulate a patient should be made on the basis of AF burden and the baseline risk of the patient. Empirical anticoagulation in patients with ESUS and no evidence of AF is an intriguing but still-unproven strategy and therefore should not be adopted outside of randomized clinical trials.
隐源性卒中(CS)和不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)是全球医疗系统面临的重大挑战。房颤(AF)在CS或ESUS后很常见。无论索引CS或ESUS的机制如何,在这些患者中检测到AF都提供了通过开具抗凝剂而非阿司匹林来降低卒中复发风险的机会。可以采用不同的监测策略来检测AF。监测策略的比较应考虑到,发表研究中报告的AF检出率,然后在荟萃分析中汇总,不仅是监测策略本身的函数,还取决于患者相关、设备相关和研究设计相关因素。一旦发现AF,应根据AF负荷和患者的基线风险来决定是否对患者进行抗凝治疗。对于ESUS且无AF证据的患者进行经验性抗凝是一种有趣但仍未得到证实的策略,因此不应在随机临床试验之外采用。