Weijs Bob, Limantoro Ione, Delhaas Tammo, de Vos Cees B, Blaauw Yuri, Houben Richard P M, Verheule Sander, Pisters Ronny, Crijns Harry J G M
Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Physiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):366-371. doi: 10.1002/clc.22877. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Many recurrences occur after electrical cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Assessment of extent of remodeling and continuous prolonged rhythm monitoring might reveal actionable recurrence mechanisms.
After ECV of AF specific patterns of arrhythmia recurrence can be distinguished.
All patients who underwent successful ECV due to persistent AF were included. Tissue velocity echocardiography during AF was performed before ECV to study atrial fibrillatory cycle length and fibrillatory velocity. After ECV, the heart rhythm of all patients was monitored 3 times daily during 4 weeks, and timing of recurrence was noted.
In total, 50 patients (68% male) were included; mean age was 68 ± 9 years. Median duration of the current AF episode was 102 (range, 74-152) days. Twenty-one (42%) patients showed recurrence of persistent AF. No recurrences occurred during the first 24 hours. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between patients with or without recurrence of AF. However, patients with early recurrence of AF had significantly higher precardioversion wall-motion velocity compared with patients who remained in sinus rhythm (2.8 [1.6-3.6] vs 1.4 [0.9-3.3] cm/s; P = 0.017), whereas atrial fibrillatory cycle length did not differ.
In this study on 50 patients successfully cardioverted for persistent AF, there was a relapse gap of ≥24 hours. This phenomenon has not been well appreciated before and offers an AF-free window of opportunity for electrocardiographically triggered cardiac imaging or complex electrophysiological procedures. Echocardiographic tissue velocity imaging may visualize atrial remodeling relevant to AF recurrence.
心房颤动(AF)患者在进行心脏电复律(ECV)后常出现复发情况。评估心房重构程度并持续进行长时间心律监测可能有助于揭示可采取行动的复发机制。
房颤患者进行心脏电复律后,可区分出特定的心律失常复发模式。
纳入所有因持续性房颤成功接受心脏电复律的患者。在心脏电复律前,于房颤期间进行组织速度超声心动图检查,以研究心房颤动周期长度和颤动速度。心脏电复律后,在4周内每天对所有患者的心律进行3次监测,并记录复发时间。
共纳入50例患者(男性占68%);平均年龄为68±9岁。当前房颤发作的中位持续时间为102天(范围74 - 152天)。21例(42%)患者出现持续性房颤复发。最初24小时内未发生复发。房颤复发患者与未复发患者的临床特征无差异。然而,房颤早期复发患者复律前的室壁运动速度显著高于维持窦性心律的患者(2.8 [1.6 - 3.6] vs 1.4 [0.9 - 3.3] cm/s;P = 0.017),而心房颤动周期长度无差异。
在这项针对50例成功复律的持续性房颤患者的研究中,存在≥24小时的复发间隔期。这一现象此前未得到充分认识,为心电图触发的心脏成像或复杂的电生理程序提供了无房颤的机会窗口。超声心动图组织速度成像可显示与房颤复发相关的心房重构。