• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么“快速通道”患者在急诊科停留超过四个小时?对预测住院时间的因素进行的调查。

Why do 'fast track' patients stay more than four hours in the emergency department? An investigation of factors that predict length of stay.

作者信息

Gill Stephen D, Lane Stephen E, Sheridan Michael, Ellis Elizabeth, Smith Darren, Stella Julian

机构信息

Emergency Department, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Physiotherapy Department, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Oct;30(5):641-647. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12964. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.12964
PMID:29569844
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low-acuity 'fast track' patients represent a large portion of Australian EDs' workload and must be managed efficiently to meet the National Emergency Access Target. The current study determined the relative importance and estimated marginal effects of patient and system-related variables in predicting ED fast track patients who stayed longer than 4 h in the ED.

METHODS

Data for ED presentations between 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015 were collected from a large regional Australian public hospital. Only 'fast track' patients were included in the analysis. A gradient boosting machine was used to predict which patients would have an ED length of stay greater or less than 4 h. The performance of the final model was tested using a validation data set that was withheld from the initial analysis. A total of 27 variables were analysed.

RESULTS

The model's performance was very good (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.89, where 1.0 is perfect prediction). The five most important variables for predicting length of stay were time-dependent and system-related (not patient-related); these were the amount of time taken from when the patient arrived at the ED to: (i) order imaging; (ii) order pathology; (iii) request admission to hospital; (iv) allocate a clinician to care for the patient; and (v) handover a patient between ED clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the most important variables for predicting length of stay greater than 4 h for fast track patients in our ED. Identifying factors that influence length of stay is a necessary step towards understanding ED patient flow and identifying improvement opportunities.

摘要

目的

低急症“快速通道”患者占澳大利亚急诊科工作量的很大一部分,必须进行有效管理以实现国家紧急就诊目标。本研究确定了患者及系统相关变量在预测急诊科快速通道患者留观时间超过4小时方面的相对重要性及估计边际效应。

方法

收集了澳大利亚一家大型地区公立医院2014年7月1日至2015年6月30日期间急诊科就诊的数据。分析仅纳入“快速通道”患者。使用梯度提升机预测哪些患者的急诊科留观时间大于或小于4小时。最终模型的性能使用初始分析时 withheld 的验证数据集进行测试。共分析了27个变量。

结果

该模型的性能非常好(受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.89,其中1.0为完美预测)。预测留观时间的五个最重要变量与时间和系统相关(而非患者相关);这些变量是患者到达急诊科后到以下各项所花费的时间:(i)开具影像检查单;(ii)开具病理检查单;(iii)请求住院;(iv)安排临床医生护理患者;(v)在急诊科医生之间交接患者。

结论

我们确定了预测我院急诊科快速通道患者留观时间超过4小时的最重要变量。识别影响留观时间的因素是理解急诊科患者流程并识别改进机会的必要步骤。

相似文献

1
Why do 'fast track' patients stay more than four hours in the emergency department? An investigation of factors that predict length of stay.为什么“快速通道”患者在急诊科停留超过四个小时?对预测住院时间的因素进行的调查。
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Oct;30(5):641-647. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12964. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
Improving Patient Flow and Decreasing Patient Length of Stay in the Pediatric Emergency Department Through Implementation of a Fast Track.通过实施快速通道,改善儿科急诊患者流程并缩短患者住院时间。
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2021;43(2):162-169. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000351.
3
Predictive variables of an emergency department quality and performance indicator: a 1-year prospective, observational, cohort study evaluating hospital and emergency census variables and emergency department time interval measurements.预测急诊质量和绩效指标的变量:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、观察性队列研究,评估医院和急诊人数变量以及急诊部门时间间隔测量。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):638-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201404. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
4
A Daytime Fast Track Improves Throughput in a Single Physician Coverage Emergency Department.日间快速通道可提高单人值班急诊科的诊疗效率。
CJEM. 2015 Nov;17(6):648-55. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.41. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
6
Effect of emergency department fast track on emergency department length of stay: a case-control study.急诊科快速通道对急诊科住院时间的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Dec;25(12):815-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.057919.
7
Adjusting patients streaming initiated by a wait time threshold in emergency department for minimizing opportunity cost.通过急诊科的等待时间阈值调整患者分流,以最小化机会成本。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jul 10;30(6):516-527. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2016-0155.
8
Effect of clinician designation on emergency department fast track performance.临床医生指定对急诊科快速通道表现的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Nov;27(11):838-42. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.083113. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
9
Effect of an independent-capacity protocol on overcrowding in an urban emergency department.独立容量协议对城市急诊科拥挤状况的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1277-1283. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00526.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
10
Impact of the implementation of a fast-track on emergency department length of stay and quality of care indicators in the Champagne-Ardenne region: a before-after study.香槟-阿登大区快速通道实施对急诊科住院时间和护理质量指标的影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 19;9(6):e026200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026200.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing interpretable machine learning models to predict length of stay and disposition decision for adult patients in emergency departments.开发可解释的机器学习模型,以预测成年急诊患者的住院时间和处置决策。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jun 26;32(1):e101152. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101152.
2
Healthcare professional perspective on barriers and facilitators of multidisciplinary team working in acute care setting: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.医疗保健专业人员对急性护理环境中多学科团队协作的障碍与促进因素的看法:一项系统综述与元综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 21;15(3):e087268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087268.
3
Leveraging machine learning and rule extraction for enhanced transparency in emergency department length of stay prediction.
利用机器学习和规则提取提高急诊科住院时间预测的透明度。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 12;6:1498939. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1498939. eCollection 2024.
4
Length of stay in the pediatrics emergency department and associated factors among pediatrics patients in Eastern Ethiopia public hospital, Ethiopia 2022.2022年埃塞俄比亚东部公立医院儿科患者在儿科急诊科的住院时间及相关因素
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0313146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313146. eCollection 2025.
5
How Super Is Supertrack? Expediting Care of Fast-track Patients through a Pediatric Emergency Department.超级通道有多“超级”?通过儿科急诊科加快快速通道患者的护理。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 18;9(5):e770. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000770. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
6
Models to predict length of stay in the emergency department: a systematic literature review and appraisal.预测急诊科住院时间的模型:系统文献回顾与评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00965-4.
7
Primary care access to radiology: Characteristics of trauma patients referred to the emergency department.初级保健获取放射学服务:急诊科转诊创伤患者的特征。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;29(1):101-107. doi: 10.1111/jep.13738. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
8
Predicting Patient Length of Stay in Australian Emergency Departments Using Data Mining.运用数据挖掘预测澳大利亚急诊科患者住院时间。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;22(13):4968. doi: 10.3390/s22134968.
9
Machine learning-based triage to identify low-severity patients with a short discharge length of stay in emergency department.基于机器学习的分诊方法,用于识别急诊科中轻症、短住院时间的患者。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 20;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00632-6.
10
Comparison of Japan nurse practitioner-led care and physician trainee-led care on patients' length of stay in a secondary emergency department: A retrospective study.比较日本执业护师主导护理和医师实习生主导护理对二级急诊患者住院时间的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2021 Oct;18(4):e12437. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12437. Epub 2021 Jun 24.