Acute Fracture of the Anterior Process of Calcaneus: Does It Herald a More Advanced Injury to Chopart Joint?

OBJECTIVE

Injuries at the calcaneocuboid and talonavicular joint have been described as two distinct, unrelated entities in the radiology literature. Our purpose was to assess the coexistence of these injuries using radiography and MRI and to correlate our findings with radiologic and clinical diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with injury at the anterior calcaneal process on radiographs or MR images were retrospectively assessed for concomitant injury at the talonavicular joint. Radiologic and clinical diagnoses and treatment were documented. McNemar and kappa statistics were calculated; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Radiographic and MRI rates of detection of injuries across the Chopart joint were statistically different. Calcaneocuboid avulsion fractures were evident on 48% of radiographs and 100% of MR images (p = 0.001). Talonavicular joint injuries were evident on 38% of radiographs and 76% of MR images (p = 0.008). Concomitant injury at both joints was evident on 14% of radiographs and 76% of MR images (p < 0.0001). Interrater agreement was 0.488-0.637 and 0.286-0.364 for talonavicular and 0.144-0.538 and 0.976-1 for calcaneocuboid injuries on radiography and MRI, respectively. Sixty percent of calcaneocuboid fractures were prospectively missed on radiography (none on MRI), whereas 38% and 25% of talonavicular findings were missed on radiography and MRI, respectively. Sixty percent of injuries were clinically misdiagnosed as ankle sprains. Chopart joint injury was never mentioned in prospective clinical or imaging diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Calcaneocuboid and talonavicular injuries commonly coexist. Radiographs underestimate severity of injury; MR images show more subtle abnormalities. Lack of mention of Chopart joint injury clinically and on imaging reports underlies the need for greater familiarity with this entity.