1 Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Division, NYU Langone Medical Center, 301 E 17th St, 6th Fl, New York, NY 10003.
2 Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Musculoskeletal Department, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):386-395. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18503. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
This study determined the frequency and MRI appearance of osseous and ligamentous injuries in midtarsal (Chopart) sprains and their association with ankle sprains after acute ankle injuries. Prospective diagnosis of and interobserver agreement regarding midtarsal injury among musculoskeletal radiologists were also assessed.
Two cohorts with ankle MRI were identified via a digital PACS search: patients who had undergone MRI within 8 weeks after ankle injury and control subjects who had not sustained ankle trauma. Studies were retrospectively reviewed in consensus as well as independently, assessing ligamentous and osseous injury to the Chopart joint (calcaneocuboid and talonavicular joints) and associated lateral collateral and deltoid ligamentous injury. Interobserver agreement was calculated, and prospective radiology reports were reviewed to determine the musculoskeletal radiologist's familiarity with Chopart joint injury.
MR images of control subjects (n = 16) and patients with ankle injury (n = 47) were reviewed. The normal dorsal calcaneocuboid and calcaneocuboid component of bifurcate ligaments were variably visualized; the remaining normal ligaments were always seen. Eleven patients (23%) had midtarsal ligamentous and osseous injury consistent with midtarsal sprain (eight acute or subacute, one probable, and two old). Six (75%) of eight acute or subacute cases had coexisting lateral collateral ligament injury. Eighty-nine percent of osseous injuries were reported prospectively, but 83% of ligamentous injuries were missed. Substantial interobserver agreement was achieved regarding diagnosis of midtarsal sprain.
Midtarsal sprains are commonly associated with acute ankle injury and with ankle sprains. Presently, midtarsal sprains may be underrecognized by radiologists; thus, greater familiarity with the MRI spectrum of ligamentous and osseous injuries at the Chopart joint is important for accurate diagnosis and clinical management.
本研究旨在确定中跗(Chopart)扭伤的骨和韧带损伤的频率和 MRI 表现及其与急性踝关节损伤后踝关节扭伤的关系。还评估了肌肉骨骼放射科医生对中跗关节损伤的诊断和观察者间一致性。
通过数字 PACS 搜索确定了两个踝关节 MRI 队列:在踝关节损伤后 8 周内接受 MRI 检查的患者和未遭受踝关节创伤的对照受试者。对研究进行了回顾性共识和独立评估,评估了 Chopart 关节(跟骨-骰骨和跗跖关节)的韧带和骨损伤以及相关的外侧副韧带和三角韧带损伤。计算了观察者间的一致性,并对前瞻性放射学报告进行了审查,以确定肌肉骨骼放射科医生对 Chopart 关节损伤的熟悉程度。
共回顾了 16 名对照受试者和 47 名踝关节损伤患者的 MRI 图像。正常的背侧跟骨-骰骨和分叉韧带的跟骨-骰骨部分可变化地显示;其余正常的韧带总是可见。11 名患者(23%)存在与中跗扭伤一致的中跗韧带和骨损伤(8 例急性或亚急性,1 例可能,2 例陈旧)。6(75%)例急性或亚急性病例存在外侧副韧带损伤。89%的骨损伤得到了前瞻性报告,但 83%的韧带损伤被遗漏。观察者间对中跗扭伤的诊断达成了实质性的一致性。
中跗扭伤通常与急性踝关节损伤和踝关节扭伤有关。目前,放射科医生可能低估了中跗扭伤;因此,更熟悉 Chopart 关节的韧带和骨损伤的 MRI 表现对于准确诊断和临床管理很重要。