• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施基于原则的猪舍气候问题动物福利指标标准。

Operationalizing Principle-Based Standards for Animal Welfare-Indicators for Climate Problems in Pig Houses.

作者信息

Vermeer Herman M, Hopster Hans

机构信息

Wageningen Livestock Research, P.O. Box 338, Wageningen 6700 AH, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2018 Mar 23;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/ani8040044.

DOI:10.3390/ani8040044
PMID:29570657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5946128/
Abstract

The Dutch animal welfare law includes so-called principle-based standards. This means that the objective is described in abstract terms, enabling farmers to comply with the law in their own way. Principle-based standards are, however, difficult for the inspection agency to enforce because strict limits are missing. This pilot project aimed at developing indicators (measurements) to assess the climate in pig houses, thus enabling the enforcement of principle-based standards. In total, 64 farms with weaners and 32 farms with growing-finishing pigs were visited. On each farm, a set of climate-related measurements was collected in six pens. For each of these measurements, a threshold value was set, and exceeding this threshold indicated a welfare risk. Farm inspections were carried out during winter and spring, thus excluding situations with heat stress. Assessment of the variation and correlation between measurements reduced the dataset from 39 to 12 measurements. Using a principal components analysis helped to select five major measurements as warning signals. The number of exceeded thresholds per pen and per farm was calculated for both the large (12) and small (five) sets of measurements. CO₂ and NH₃ concentrations were related to the outside temperature. On colder days, there was less ventilation, and thus CO₂ and NH₃ concentrations increased. Air quality, reflected in the CO₂ and NH₃ concentrations, was associated with respiratory problems. Eye scores were positively correlated with both pig and pen fouling, and pig and pen fouling were closely related. We selected five signal indicators: CO₂, NH₃, and tail and eye score for weaners and finishers, and added ear score for weaners and pig fouling for growing-finishing pigs. The results indicate that pig farms can be ranked based on five signal indicators related to reduced animal welfare caused by climatic conditions. This approach could be adopted to other principle-based standards for pigs as well as for other species.

摘要

荷兰动物福利法包含所谓的基于原则的标准。这意味着目标是以抽象的术语描述的,使农民能够以自己的方式遵守法律。然而,基于原则的标准对检查机构来说难以执行,因为缺少严格的限制。这个试点项目旨在制定指标(测量方法)来评估猪舍的环境,从而使基于原则的标准得以执行。总共走访了64个有断奶仔猪的农场和32个有生长育肥猪的农场。在每个农场,在六个猪栏中收集了一组与环境相关的测量数据。对于这些测量中的每一项,都设定了一个阈值,超过这个阈值就表明存在福利风险。农场检查在冬季和春季进行,因此排除了热应激的情况。对测量数据之间的差异和相关性进行评估后,数据集从39项减少到了12项。使用主成分分析有助于选择五项主要测量数据作为预警信号。针对大(12项)、小(5项)两组测量数据,计算了每个猪栏和每个农场超过阈值的数量。二氧化碳和氨气浓度与室外温度有关。在较冷的日子里,通风较少,因此二氧化碳和氨气浓度会增加。以二氧化碳和氨气浓度反映的空气质量与呼吸道问题有关。眼部评分与猪和猪栏的污染程度呈正相关,而且猪和猪栏的污染密切相关。我们选择了五个信号指标:断奶仔猪和育肥猪的二氧化碳、氨气、尾巴和眼部评分,断奶仔猪增加耳部评分,生长育肥猪增加猪的污染程度评分。结果表明,可以根据与气候条件导致的动物福利降低相关的五个信号指标对养猪场进行排名。这种方法也可以应用于其他基于猪的原则标准以及其他物种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/be22942eda9a/animals-08-00044-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/049d8c2c443e/animals-08-00044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/6294576c445f/animals-08-00044-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/15d037656e5a/animals-08-00044-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/be22942eda9a/animals-08-00044-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/049d8c2c443e/animals-08-00044-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/6294576c445f/animals-08-00044-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/15d037656e5a/animals-08-00044-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/5946128/be22942eda9a/animals-08-00044-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Operationalizing Principle-Based Standards for Animal Welfare-Indicators for Climate Problems in Pig Houses.实施基于原则的猪舍气候问题动物福利指标标准。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Mar 23;8(4):44. doi: 10.3390/ani8040044.
2
High biosecurity and welfare standards in fattening pig farms are associated with reduced antimicrobial use.在育肥猪场采用高生物安全和福利标准与减少抗菌药物的使用有关。
Animal. 2020 Oct;14(10):2178-2186. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000828. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.“真实福利”计划:英国商业养猪场福利结果的风险与保护因素识别
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Oct 1;146:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Measuring welfare in rearing piglets: test-retest reliability of selected animal-based indicators.测量育肥仔猪福利:选择基于动物的指标的重测信度。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad162.
5
Pig carcass tail lesions: the influence of record keeping through an advisory service and the relationship with farm performance parameters.猪胴体尾部病变:通过咨询服务进行记录保存的影响以及与猪场生产性能参数的关系
Animal. 2017 Jan;11(1):140-146. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001117. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.胴体损伤作为猪场内健康和福利指标的验证
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1528-1536. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1180.
7
Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study.屠宰场育肥肥猪的基于动物的措施及其与农场动物福利的关联:一项初步研究。
Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):108-118. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001320. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
8
Prevalence of welfare outcomes in the weaner and finisher stages of the production cycle on 31 Irish pig farms.爱尔兰31个养猪场生产周期中断奶仔猪和育肥猪阶段福利结果的发生率。
Ir Vet J. 2018 Mar 27;71:9. doi: 10.1186/s13620-018-0121-5. eCollection 2018.
9
Reduced Stocking Density and Provision of Straw in a Rack Improve Pig Welfare on Commercial Fattening Farms.降低饲养密度并在栏架中提供稻草可改善商业育肥猪场的猪福利。
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Dec 8;8:656211. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.656211. eCollection 2021.
10
Effects of three husbandry systems on health, welfare and productivity of organic pigs.三种饲养制度对有机猪健康、福利和生产性能的影响。
Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):2025-2033. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000041. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of driving style and bedding in pigs transported to slaughterhouse in different temperatures.不同温度下运输至屠宰场的猪的驾驶方式和铺垫物的影响。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2023 Jul;65(4):878-889. doi: 10.5187/jast.2023.e73. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
2
Exploratory inference of the ingestive behavior of pigs in the finishing phase in an air-conditioned environment.探究性推断在空调环境中育肥阶段猪的摄食行为。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Jul 13;55(4):266. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03686-1.
3
Combined effects of weather conditions, transportation time and loading density on carcass damages and meat quality of market-weight pigs.

本文引用的文献

1
Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.猪的泪痕:商业农场福利评估的潜在工具。
Animal. 2016 Feb;10(2):318-25. doi: 10.1017/S175173111500172X. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
2
The impact of chronic environmental stressors on growing pigs, Sus scrofa (Part 2): social behaviour.慢性环境应激源对生长猪(野猪)的影响(第2部分):社会行为
Animal. 2010 Nov;4(11):1910-21. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110001084.
3
Noninfectious factors associated with pneumonia and pleuritis in slaughtered pigs from 143 farrow-to-finish pig farms.
天气条件、运输时间和装载密度对上市体重猪胴体损伤和肉质的综合影响。
Arch Anim Breed. 2021 Oct 14;64(2):425-435. doi: 10.5194/aab-64-425-2021. eCollection 2021.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Seven Measures to Reduce Tail Biting Lesions in Fattening Pigs.七种减少育肥猪咬尾损伤措施的成本效益分析
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 7;8:682330. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.682330. eCollection 2021.
5
Soiling of Pig Pens: A Review of Eliminative Behaviour.猪舍的粪便污染:排泄行为综述
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 3;10(11):2025. doi: 10.3390/ani10112025.
与 143 个育肥猪农场屠宰猪的肺炎和胸膜炎相关的非传染性因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 May 1;104(3-4):271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 21.