Suppr超能文献

三种饲养制度对有机猪健康、福利和生产性能的影响。

Effects of three husbandry systems on health, welfare and productivity of organic pigs.

机构信息

Department for Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.

Research Centre for Animal Production and Aquaculture, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Via Beccastecca, 345 San Cesario sul Panaro, 41018 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Animal. 2019 Sep;13(9):2025-2033. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000041. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Abstract

Organic pig husbandry systems in Europe are diverse - ranging from indoor systems with concrete outside run (IN) to outdoor systems all year round (OUT) and combinations of both on one farm (POUT). As this diversity has rarely been taken into account in research projects on organic pig production, the aim of this study was to assess and compare pig health, welfare and productivity in these three systems. Animal health and welfare were assessed using direct observation and records of 22 animal-based measures, comprising 17 health-, 3 productivity- and 2 behavioural measures. These were collected in pregnant sows, weaners and fattening pigs during direct observations and from records within a cross-sectional study on 74 farms (IN: n = 34, POUT: n = 28, OUT: n = 12) in eight countries. Overall, prevalence of several animal health and welfare issues was low (e.g. median 0% for pigs needing hospitalisation, shoulder lesions, ectoparasites; <5% for runts, tail lesions, conjunctivitis). Exceptions in particular systems were respiratory problems in weaners and fatteners (IN: 60.0%, 66.7%; POUT: 66.7%, 60.0%), weaning diarrhoea (IN: 25.0%), and short tails in fatteners (IN: 6.5%, POUT: 2.3%). Total suckling piglet losses (recorded over a period of 12 months per farm) were high in all three systems (IN: 21.3%; POUT: 21.6; OUT: 19.2%). OUT had lower prevalences of respiratory problems, diarrhoea and lameness of sows. POUT farms in most cases kept sows outdoors and weaners and fatteners similar to IN farms, which was reflected in the results regarding several health and welfare parameters. It can be concluded, that European organic pigs kept in all three types of husbandry system showed a low prevalence of health and welfare problems as assessed by our methodology, but respiratory health and diarrhoea should be improved in weaners and fatteners kept indoors and total piglet mortality in all systems. The results provide benchmarks for organic pig producers and organisations which can be used in strategies to promote health and welfare improvement. Furthermore, in future research, the identified health and welfare issues (e.g. suckling piglet mortality, weaning diarrhoea) should be addressed, specifically considering effects of husbandry systems.

摘要

欧洲的有机养猪系统多种多样——从带有混凝土外跑的室内系统(IN)到全年户外系统(OUT),再到一个农场内的两者结合(POUT)。由于在有机养猪生产的研究项目中很少考虑到这种多样性,因此本研究旨在评估和比较这三种系统中的猪健康、福利和生产力。通过直接观察和 22 项基于动物的措施的记录来评估动物健康和福利,这些措施包括 17 项健康、3 项生产力和 2 项行为措施。这些措施是在怀孕母猪、断奶仔猪和育肥猪的直接观察期间收集的,以及在 8 个国家的 74 个农场(IN:n=34、POUT:n=28、OUT:n=12)的横断面研究记录中收集的。总体而言,许多动物健康和福利问题的发生率较低(例如,需要住院治疗、肩部病变、寄生虫的猪的中位数为 0%; runt、尾巴病变、结膜炎的猪的发生率低于 5%)。在特定系统中,断奶仔猪和育肥猪的呼吸道问题(IN:60.0%、66.7%;POUT:66.7%、60.0%)、断奶腹泻(IN:25.0%)和育肥猪尾巴短(IN:6.5%、POUT:2.3%)是例外。所有三种系统的总哺乳仔猪损失(每个农场在 12 个月的记录期间记录)都很高(IN:21.3%;POUT:21.6%;OUT:19.2%)。OUT 系统中母猪的呼吸道问题、腹泻和跛行的发生率较低。POUT 农场通常将母猪养在户外,将断奶仔猪和育肥猪养在与 IN 农场相似的环境中,这反映在我们方法评估的一些健康和福利参数的结果中。可以得出结论,欧洲有机猪在所有三种养殖系统中表现出低发病率的健康和福利问题,但应改善室内饲养的断奶仔猪和育肥猪的呼吸道健康和腹泻问题,以及所有系统中的仔猪总死亡率。这些结果为有机养猪生产者和组织提供了基准,可以用于促进健康和福利改善的策略。此外,在未来的研究中,应解决确定的健康和福利问题(例如,哺乳仔猪死亡率、断奶腹泻),特别是要考虑养殖系统的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验