Suppr超能文献

首次及再次冠状动脉血管成形术中再狭窄及其决定因素

Restenosis and its determinants in first and repeat coronary angioplasty.

作者信息

Rapold H J, David P R, Guiteras Val P, Mata A L, Crean P A, Bourassa M G

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1987 Jun;8(6):575-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062325.

Abstract

Restenosis is the main problem limiting long-term success of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and is most accurately evaluated by follow-up angiography. We compared the primary and long-term results of angioplasty in 268 consecutive patients (293 segments) with first PTCA (PTCA 1, angiographic follow-up 98%) and in 66 patients (76 segments) with repeat PTCA after restenosis (PTCA 2, angiographic follow-up 92%). Forty clinical, angiographic and procedural factors were assessed in relation to outcome. Primary success rate was higher in PTCA 2 (91% vs 67.5%) and major complications were fewer (4.5% vs 16%). Higher inflation pressure (7.9 +/- 2.3 vs 6.8 +/- 1.8 atm, P less than 0.005) and larger balloons (3.5 +/- 0.5 vs 3.2 +/- 0.5 mm, P less than 0.005) were used for PTCA 2, resulting in lesser residual stenosis (33 +/- 16% vs 40 +/- 18%, P less than 0.05). Restenosis rate (greater than or equal to 70%) after PTCA 1 and after PTCA 2 (27% vs 36%, P = NS) and the mean time to recurrence (4.7 vs 5.3 months, P = NS) were similar. Procedural factors were the main determinants of long-term success in primary PTCA. The restenosis risk was independently related to residual stenosis greater than or equal to 45% (P less than 0.001), variant angina (P less than 0.05) and multivessel disease (P less than 0.05) after PTCA 1 and to male sex (P less than 0.001) and higher inflation pressure (P less than 0.05) after PTCA 2. Mild to moderate intimal tearing was associated with less restenosis after PTCA 1, but not after PTCA 2. Including 9 patients (10 segments) with a third PTCA, 70% of the 66 patients with repeat PTCA had a successful long-term outcome. Repeat angioplasty should therefore be considered as an integral part of PTCA therapy. Restenosis however remains a major concern. An optimal primary result with a minimal residual stenosis is decisive for first PTCA, whereas avoidance of a dissection by using lower inflation pressure on a restenosis might improve the long-term outcome of repeat PTCA.

摘要

再狭窄是限制经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)长期成功的主要问题,通过随访血管造影可进行最准确的评估。我们比较了268例连续接受首次PTCA(PTCA 1,血管造影随访率98%)的患者(293个节段)和66例再狭窄后接受重复PTCA的患者(76个节段)(PTCA 2,血管造影随访率92%)的初次及长期结果。评估了40项临床、血管造影和操作因素与结果的关系。PTCA 2的初次成功率更高(91%对67.5%),主要并发症更少(4.5%对16%)。PTCA 2使用了更高的充盈压力(7.9±2.3对6.8±1.8大气压,P<0.005)和更大的球囊(3.5±0.5对3.2±0.5毫米,P<0.005),导致残余狭窄更小(33±16%对40±18%,P<0.05)。PTCA 1和PTCA 2后的再狭窄率(≥70%)(27%对36%,P=无显著性差异)及复发的平均时间(4.7对5.3个月,P=无显著性差异)相似。操作因素是初次PTCA长期成功的主要决定因素。再狭窄风险与PTCA 1后残余狭窄≥45%(P<0.001)、变异型心绞痛(P<0.05)和多支血管病变(P<0.05)独立相关,与PTCA 2后的男性性别(P<0.001)和更高的充盈压力(P<0.05)独立相关。轻度至中度内膜撕裂与PTCA 1后再狭窄较少相关,但与PTCA 2后无关。包括9例(10个节段)接受第三次PTCA的患者,66例接受重复PTCA的患者中有70%获得了成功的长期结果。因此,重复血管成形术应被视为PTCA治疗的一个组成部分。然而,再狭窄仍然是一个主要问题。初次PTCA取得最佳结果并使残余狭窄最小对于首次PTCA至关重要,而在再狭窄时通过使用较低的充盈压力避免夹层可能会改善重复PTCA的长期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验