Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1463-1472. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5031-6. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
Health insurance coverage changes for many patients after liver transplantation, but the implications of this change on long-term outcomes are unclear.
To assess post-transplant patient and graft survival according to change in insurance coverage within 1 year of transplantation.
We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing for patients between ages 18-64 years undergoing liver transplantation in 2002-2016. Patients surviving > 1 year were categorized by insurance coverage at transplantation and the 1-year transplant anniversary. Multivariable Cox regression characterized the association between coverage pattern and long-term patient or graft survival.
Among 34,487 patients in the analysis, insurance coverage patterns included continuous private coverage (58%), continuous public coverage (29%), private to public transition (8%) and public to private transition (4%). In multivariable analysis of patient survival, continuous public insurance (HR 1.29, CI 1.22, 1.37, p < 0.001), private to public transition (HR 1.17, CI 1.07, 1.28, p < 0.001), and public to private transition (HR 1.14, CI 1.00, 1.29, p = 0.044), were associated with greater mortality hazard, compared to continuous private coverage. After disaggregating public coverage by source, mortality hazard was highest for patients transitioning from private insurance to Medicaid (HR vs. continuous private coverage = 1.32; 95% CI 1.14, 1.52; p < 0.001). Similar differences by insurance category were found for death-censored graft failure.
Post-transplant transition to public insurance coverage is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes when compared to retaining private coverage.
许多患者在接受肝移植后,其医疗保险覆盖范围发生了变化,但这种变化对长期结果的影响尚不清楚。
评估肝移植后 1 年内保险覆盖范围变化对患者和移植物存活率的影响。
我们查询了 2002 年至 2016 年期间年龄在 18-64 岁之间接受肝移植的 United Network for Organ Sharing 患者的数据。将存活时间超过 1 年的患者根据移植时和移植 1 周年时的保险覆盖范围进行分类。多变量 Cox 回归分析了覆盖模式与长期患者或移植物存活率之间的关系。
在分析的 34487 名患者中,保险覆盖模式包括连续私人保险(58%)、连续公共保险(29%)、私人保险转为公共保险(8%)和公共保险转为私人保险(4%)。在患者生存率的多变量分析中,连续公共保险(HR 1.29,CI 1.22,1.37,p<0.001)、私人保险转为公共保险(HR 1.17,CI 1.07,1.28,p<0.001)和公共保险转为私人保险(HR 1.14,CI 1.00,1.29,p=0.044)与更高的死亡率风险相关,与连续私人保险相比。在将公共保险按来源细分后,发现从私人保险转为医疗补助的患者死亡率风险最高(与连续私人保险相比 HR=1.32;95%CI 1.14,1.52;p<0.001)。对于死亡相关的移植物失败,也发现了类似的保险类别差异。
与保留私人保险相比,肝移植后转为公共保险覆盖范围与不良结局风险增加相关。