• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对早产儿出生时进行重复与标准触觉刺激的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Repetitive versus standard tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth - A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

The Ritchie Center, MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.030
PMID:29580959
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the direct effect of repetitive tactile stimulation on breathing effort of preterm infants at birth.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial compared the effect of repetitive stimulation on respiratory effort during the first 4 min after birth with standard stimulation based on clinical indication in preterm infants with a gestational age of 27-32 weeks. All details of the stimulation performed were noted. The main study parameter measured was respiratory minute volume, other study parameters assessed measures of respiratory effort; tidal volumes, rate of rise to maximum tidal volumes, percentage of recruitment breaths, and oxygenation of the infant.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in respiratory minute volume in the repetitive stimulation group when compared to the standard group. Oxygen saturation was significantly higher (87.6 ± 3.3% vs 81.7 ± 8.7%, p = .01) while the amount of FiO given during transport to the NICU was lower (28.2 (22.8-35.0)% vs 33.6 (29.4-44.1)%, p = .04). There was no significant difference in administration of positive pressure ventilation (52% vs 78%, p = .13), or the duration of ventilation (median (IQR) time 8 (0-118)s vs 35 (13-131)s, p = .23). Caregivers decided less often to administer caffeine in the delivery room to stimulate breathing in the repetitive stimulation group (10% vs 39%, p = .036).

CONCLUSION

Although the increase in respiratory effort during repetitive stimulation did not reach significance, oxygenation significantly improved with a lower level of FiO at transport to the NICU. Repetitive tactile stimulation could be of added value to improve breathing effort at birth.

摘要

目的

评估重复触觉刺激对 27-32 孕周早产儿出生时呼吸努力的直接影响。

方法

本随机对照试验比较了 27-32 孕周早产儿出生后 4 分钟内重复刺激与基于临床指征的标准刺激对呼吸努力的影响。记录了所有刺激的详细信息。主要研究参数为呼吸分钟量,其他研究参数评估呼吸努力的措施;潮气量、最大潮气量上升率、募集呼吸百分比和婴儿氧合。

结果

与标准组相比,重复刺激组的呼吸分钟量无显著差异。氧饱和度显著升高(87.6±3.3% vs 81.7±8.7%,p=0.01),而转运至新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)时给予的 FiO 量较低(28.2(22.8-35.0)% vs 33.6(29.4-44.1)%,p=0.04)。接受正压通气(52% vs 78%,p=0.13)或通气时间(中位数(IQR)时间 8(0-118)s vs 35(13-131)s,p=0.23)无显著差异。在重复刺激组,护理人员在分娩室决定给予咖啡因以刺激呼吸的次数较少(10% vs 39%,p=0.036)。

结论

尽管重复刺激引起的呼吸努力增加没有达到显著性,但转运至 NICU 时 FiO 水平较低,氧合显著改善。重复触觉刺激可能对改善出生时的呼吸努力有额外的价值。

相似文献

1
Repetitive versus standard tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth - A randomized controlled trial.对早产儿出生时进行重复与标准触觉刺激的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jun;127:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.030. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
The Breathing Effort of Very Preterm Infants at Birth.出生时极早产儿的呼吸努力。
J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.008. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Caffeine to improve breathing effort of preterm infants at birth: a randomized controlled trial.咖啡因改善早产儿出生时呼吸努力:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Res. 2017 Aug;82(2):290-296. doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.45. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
High vs. Low Initial Oxygen to Improve the Breathing Effort of Preterm Infants at Birth: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.出生时高初始氧与低初始氧对改善早产儿呼吸努力的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Pediatr. 2019 May 7;7:179. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00179. eCollection 2019.
5
The administration of 100% oxygen and respiratory drive in very preterm infants at birth.出生时对极早产儿给予100%氧气和呼吸驱动。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e76898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076898. eCollection 2013.
6
Tidal volumes in spontaneously breathing preterm infants supported with continuous positive airway pressure.持续气道正压通气支持下的早产儿自主呼吸潮气量。
J Pediatr. 2014 Oct;165(4):702-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.06.047. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
7
Mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room.产房内早产儿的面罩通气。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Sep;98(5):F405-10. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303313. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
[Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial].[三种无创正压通气作为呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿主要通气模式的应用:一项随机对照试验]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;52(1):34-40.
9
Positive effects of early continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary function in extremely premature infants: results of a subgroup analysis of the COIN trial.早期持续气道正压通气对极早产儿肺功能的积极影响:COIN 试验亚组分析结果。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Sep;96(5):F371-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.181008. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
10
The Effect of Initial High vs. Low FiO on Breathing Effort in Preterm Infants at Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.出生时初始高与低吸氧浓度对早产儿呼吸努力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Pediatr. 2019 Dec 12;7:504. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00504. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregivers' response to cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants in the NICU - A quantitative overview.新生儿重症监护病房中护理人员对早产儿心肺事件的反应——定量综述。
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Jan;114(1):92-99. doi: 10.1111/apa.17407. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Early Respiratory Physiotherapy versus an Individualized Postural Care Program for Reducing Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Infants: A Randomised Controlled Trial.早期呼吸物理治疗与个体化体位护理方案对减少早产儿机械通气的效果比较:一项随机对照试验
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 30;10(11):1761. doi: 10.3390/children10111761.
3
Reducing the time delay of oxygen transport to the neonate on continuous positive airway pressure support: A bench study.
在持续气道正压通气支持下减少向新生儿输送氧气的时间延迟:一项实验台研究。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 19;11:1141432. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1141432. eCollection 2023.
4
European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.欧洲呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南:2022 年更新版。
Neonatology. 2023;120(1):3-23. doi: 10.1159/000528914. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Tactile stimulation in very preterm infants and their needs of non-invasive respiratory support.极早产儿的触觉刺激及其无创呼吸支持需求
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 18;10:1041898. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1041898. eCollection 2022.
6
Tactile stimulation in the delivery room: past, present, future. A systematic review.产房内的触觉刺激:过去、现在和未来。系统评价。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Aug;96(3):616-624. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01945-9. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
7
Feasibility and Effect of Physiological-Based CPAP in Preterm Infants at Birth.基于生理指标的持续气道正压通气在早产儿出生时的可行性及效果
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 3;9:777614. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.777614. eCollection 2021.
8
Video recording in the delivery room: current status, implications and implementation.产房视频记录:现状、影响及实施情况
Pediatr Res. 2024 Aug;96(3):610-615. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01865-0. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
9
Delivery Room Care for Premature Infants Born after Less than 25 Weeks' Gestation-A Narrative Review.孕周小于25周的早产儿产房护理——一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 2;8(10):882. doi: 10.3390/children8100882.
10
Effects of early respiratory physiotherapy on spontaneous respiratory activity of preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.早期呼吸物理治疗对早产儿自主呼吸活动的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2021 Jul 26;22(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05446-8.