Repetitive versus standard tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth - A randomized controlled trial.

AIM

To evaluate the direct effect of repetitive tactile stimulation on breathing effort of preterm infants at birth.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial compared the effect of repetitive stimulation on respiratory effort during the first 4 min after birth with standard stimulation based on clinical indication in preterm infants with a gestational age of 27-32 weeks. All details of the stimulation performed were noted. The main study parameter measured was respiratory minute volume, other study parameters assessed measures of respiratory effort; tidal volumes, rate of rise to maximum tidal volumes, percentage of recruitment breaths, and oxygenation of the infant.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in respiratory minute volume in the repetitive stimulation group when compared to the standard group. Oxygen saturation was significantly higher (87.6 ± 3.3% vs 81.7 ± 8.7%, p = .01) while the amount of FiO given during transport to the NICU was lower (28.2 (22.8-35.0)% vs 33.6 (29.4-44.1)%, p = .04). There was no significant difference in administration of positive pressure ventilation (52% vs 78%, p = .13), or the duration of ventilation (median (IQR) time 8 (0-118)s vs 35 (13-131)s, p = .23). Caregivers decided less often to administer caffeine in the delivery room to stimulate breathing in the repetitive stimulation group (10% vs 39%, p = .036).

CONCLUSION

Although the increase in respiratory effort during repetitive stimulation did not reach significance, oxygenation significantly improved with a lower level of FiO at transport to the NICU. Repetitive tactile stimulation could be of added value to improve breathing effort at birth.