Kate Duchowny, MPH, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population health, 1415 Washington Heights, 3rd Flower Tower, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, Phone: (734) 615-9209, Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(4):501-507. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0951-y.
Muscle weakness is an important indicator of disability, chronic disease and mortality. While we recently proposed sex/race specific grip strength cutpoints for clinical muscle weakness in a diverse, nationally representative sample of older Americans, the extent to which these cutpoints predict physical disability remains unknown.
To examine whether sex/race specific muscle weakness cutpoints predict physical disability status in a nationally representative sample of Americans age 65+.
We used data from the 2006-2010 Health and Retirement Study. Fully-adjusted, weighted multinomial logistic regression models were used to quantify the odds of experiencing the onset, progression or persistence of disability in activities of daily living (ADL) among weak versus non-weak individuals over a 2-year period.
General community, nationally representative sample of older Americans.
Population-based, community dwelling sample of older American adults aged 65-years+; 57 percent were women, 91% were White and the mean age was 75 years. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): The primary outcome of interest was disability dynamics, defined by changes in ADL status across at 2- year period. The primary exposure was clinical muscle weakness as defined by previously identified cutpoints. Hypotheses were formulated before analyses were conducted.
In this nationally representative sample (n= 8,725), 44% of individuals were classified as weak at baseline. At follow-up, 55% remained independent with no change in their ADL status, 11% had an onset of disability and 4% progressed in their disability status. The odds of experiencing an onset of ADL disability was 54% higher among weak individuals compared those who were not weak at baseline (OR= 1.54, 95% CI= 1.54, 1.5, p<.0001); the odds of experiencing a progression in physical disability status was 2.16 times higher among those who were weak at baseline compared to non-weak individuals (OR= 2.16, 95% CI= 2.15, 2.16, p<.0001).
This is the first study to use grip strength weakness cut-points to identify those who may be at greatest risk for experiencing physical disability in later life. Results underscore the importance of using population-specific cutpoints for clinical weakness in order to identify individuals at greatest risk for adverse health outcomes.
肌肉无力是残疾、慢性疾病和死亡的一个重要指标。虽然我们最近在一个多样化的、具有全国代表性的美国老年人样本中提出了针对临床肌肉无力的特定于性别的握力切点,但这些切点在多大程度上预测身体残疾状态尚不清楚。
研究特定于性别的肌肉无力切点是否可以预测具有全国代表性的美国 65 岁以上人群的身体残疾状态。
我们使用了 2006-2010 年健康与退休研究的数据。在两年的时间内,使用完全调整的、加权的多项逻辑回归模型来量化与非虚弱个体相比,虚弱个体在日常生活活动(ADL)中经历残疾发作、进展或持续存在的几率。
一般社区,具有全国代表性的美国老年人样本。
基于人群、居住在社区的 65 岁以上的美国成年人样本;57%为女性,91%为白人,平均年龄为 75 岁。主要结果和措施:主要关注的结果是残疾动态,定义为在两年内 ADL 状态的变化。主要暴露是通过先前确定的切点定义的临床肌肉无力。假设在分析之前提出。
在这个具有全国代表性的样本中(n=8725),44%的个体在基线时被归类为虚弱。在随访时,55%的个体仍然保持独立,ADL 状态没有变化,11%的个体出现残疾发作,4%的个体残疾状态进展。与基线时不虚弱的个体相比,虚弱个体发生 ADL 残疾发作的几率高 54%(OR=1.54,95%CI=1.54,1.5,p<.0001);与非虚弱个体相比,基线时虚弱的个体身体残疾状态进展的几率高 2.16 倍(OR=2.16,95%CI=2.15,2.16,p<.0001)。
这是第一项使用握力弱点切点来确定那些在以后的生活中最有可能经历身体残疾的人的研究。研究结果强调了在识别最有可能出现不良健康结果的个体时,使用特定于人群的临床弱点切点的重要性。