Gana T J, Huhlewych R, Koo J
Surgical-Medical Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
J Surg Res. 1987 Oct;43(4):337-43. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(87)90090-4.
We compared focal gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) values simultaneously obtained by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and hydrogen gas clearance (HGC) from the same point in a chambered segment model of the gastric corpus in two sets of experiments (Experiments 1 and 2) involving nine anesthetized dogs (weighing 20-30 kg). We also investigated the feasibility of obtaining a conversion factor for LDF signal to absolute flow values. The GMBF values showed a highly significant linear correlation within individual experiments and for the combined data in experiments 1 (r = 0.7132, P less than 0.0001, n = 37) and 2 (r = 0.5660, P less than 0.0001, n = 61). The combined data did not corroborate a common regression line hypothesis in both experiments (Experiment 1: F = 6.59, P less than 0.0005; Experiment 2: F = 10.57, P less than 0.0005). There was a statistically significant difference between the slopes of the 5 and 4 linear regression lines obtained in Experiments 1 (F = 13.15, P less than 0.0005) and 2 (F = 21.14, P less than 0.0005), respectively. The LDF signal was stable and optical coupling is not a problem in this experimental model. HGC and GMBF values were reliable and highly reproducible within dog measurements. We conclude that LDF and HGC are comparable in the measurement of focal GMBF. Our data, however, did not suggest the existence of a conversion factor for LDF signal to absolute flow values from experiment to experiment. Conversion will have to be within individual experiments. Thus, LDF may only be useful in situations where qualitative changes in focal blood flow are investigated.
在两组实验(实验1和实验2)中,我们比较了通过激光多普勒血流仪(LDF)和氢气清除法(HGC)同时从9只麻醉犬(体重20 - 30千克)胃体分室段模型的同一点获得的局部胃黏膜血流(GMBF)值。我们还研究了获得LDF信号到绝对血流值转换因子的可行性。GMBF值在各个实验以及实验1(r = 0.7132,P < 0.0001,n = 37)和实验2(r = 0.5660,P < 0.0001,n = 61)的合并数据中显示出高度显著的线性相关性。合并数据并未证实两个实验中的共同回归线假设(实验1:F = 6.59,P < 0.0005;实验2:F = 10.57,P < 0.0005)。分别在实验1(F = 13.15,P < 0.0005)和实验2(F = 21.14,P < 0.0005)中获得的5条和4条线性回归线的斜率之间存在统计学显著差异。在该实验模型中,LDF信号稳定且光耦合不是问题。HGC和GMBF值在犬类测量中可靠且具有高度可重复性。我们得出结论,在局部GMBF测量中LDF和HGC具有可比性。然而,我们的数据并未表明从一个实验到另一个实验存在LDF信号到绝对血流值的转换因子。转换必须在各个实验内进行。因此,LDF可能仅在研究局部血流定性变化的情况下有用。