Suppr超能文献

患有慢性下腰痛的困境患者的结局:临床试验的亚组分析。

Outcomes in Distressed Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Subgroup Analysis of a Clinical Trial.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jun;48(6):491-495. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7670. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

Abstract

Study Design Subgroup analysis of a controlled clinical trial. Background Current evidence suggests that people with chronic low back pain who are distressed may require different interventions than do those who are not distressed. Recently, the enhanced transtheoretical model intervention (ETMI) reported significant improvements in disability and pain and increased physical activity in patients with chronic low back pain compared to physical therapy as usual. Objectives To compare outcomes between ETMI and physical therapy interventions for participants with and without self-reported distress. Methods We tested the interaction between intervention (ETMI versus physical therapy) and distress status (using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey cut point), and performed between-group comparisons on 3 separate outcomes (disability, pain, and physical activity) at 3 and 12 months. Results In the ETMI group, 57 of 108 participants were considered distressed, versus 62 of 106 participants in the physical therapy group. The interaction between intervention and distress at 12 months was significant. Participants improved with both interventions, but the magnitude of change in distressed participants who received ETMI was larger than that in distressed participants who received physical therapy (mean ± SD difference from baseline in disability of 6.1 ± 6.1 in the ETMI group, compared with 3.4 ± 6.7 in the physical therapy group). Conclusion The enhanced transtheoretical model intervention was significantly more effective than physical therapy in participants with distress. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01631344). Level of Evidence Therapy, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(6):491-495. Epub 27 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7670.

摘要

研究设计

一项对照临床试验的亚组分析。

背景

目前的证据表明,患有慢性下腰痛且感到痛苦的患者可能需要不同于那些没有痛苦的患者的干预措施。最近,强化跨理论模型干预(ETMI)与常规物理治疗相比,报告称在慢性下腰痛患者的残疾、疼痛和身体活动方面有显著改善。

目的

比较 ETMI 和物理治疗干预对报告有或没有自我报告的痛苦的参与者的结果。

方法

我们测试了干预(ETMI 与物理治疗)和痛苦状态(使用医疗结果研究 12 项简短健康调查的切点)之间的相互作用,并在 3 个月和 12 个月时对 3 个独立结果(残疾、疼痛和身体活动)进行了组间比较。

结果

在 ETMI 组中,108 名参与者中有 57 名被认为是痛苦的,而在物理治疗组中,106 名参与者中有 62 名。12 个月时干预和痛苦之间的相互作用是显著的。参与者在两种干预措施下都有所改善,但接受 ETMI 的痛苦参与者的变化幅度大于接受物理治疗的痛苦参与者(从基线到残疾的 ETMI 组的平均差异±6.1±6.1,而物理治疗组为 3.4±6.7)。

结论

在有痛苦的参与者中,强化跨理论模型干预明显比物理治疗更有效。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT01631344)。

证据水平

治疗,2b 级。

骨科与运动物理治疗杂志 2018 年;48(6):491-495。2018 年 3 月 27 日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7670.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验