1Independent Researcher,Eugene, OR 97405,USA.
2Department of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences,University of Massachusetts Lowell,Lowell,MA 01854,USA.
Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(10):1157-1167. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000417. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
There is growing evidence that intakes of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), HFCS-sweetened soda, fruit drinks and apple juice - a high-fructose 100 % juice - are associated with asthma, possibly because of the high fructose:glucose ratios and underlying fructose malabsorption, which may contribute to enteral formation of pro-inflammatory advanced glycation end products, which bind receptors that are mediators of asthma. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between intakes of these beverages and asthma risk, with data from the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diet soda and orange juice - a 100 % juice with a 1:1 fructose:glucose ratio - were included for comparison. Increasing intake of any combination of HFCS-sweetened soda, fruit drinks and apple juice was significantly associated with progressively higher asthma risk, plateauing at 5-7 times/week v. never/seldom, independent of potential confounders (hazard ratio 1·91, P<0·001). About once a day consumers of HFCS-sweetened soda had a 49 % higher risk (P<0·011), moderate apple juice consumers (2-4 times/week) had a 61 % higher risk (P<0·007) and moderate fruit drink consumers had a 58 % higher risk (P<0·009), as compared with never/seldom consumers. There were no associations with diet soda/orange juice. These associations are possibly because of the high fructose:glucose ratios, and fructose malabsorption. Recommendations to reduce consumption may be inadequate to address asthma risk, as associations are evident even with moderate intake of these beverages, including apple juice - a 100 % juice. The juice reductions in the US Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children in 2009, and the plateauing/decreasing asthma prevalence (2010-2013), particularly among non-Hispanic black children, may be related. Further research regarding the consequences of fructose malabsorption is needed.
越来越多的证据表明,高果糖玉米糖浆(HFCS)、HFCS 甜味苏打水、果汁饮料和苹果汁(100%纯果汁)的摄入量与哮喘有关,这可能是由于果糖:葡萄糖比例高和潜在的果糖吸收不良,这可能导致肠道形成促炎的晚期糖基化终产物,这些产物与哮喘的介质受体结合。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来评估这些饮料的摄入量与哮喘风险之间的关联,数据来自弗雷明汉后代队列。为了进行比较,还包括了无糖苏打水和橙汁(100%纯果汁,果糖:葡萄糖比例为 1:1)。随着 HFCS 甜味苏打水、果汁饮料和苹果汁任意组合摄入量的增加,哮喘风险显著升高,每周 5-7 次达到高峰,与从不/很少饮用相比(风险比 1.91,P<0.001)。每周大约饮用一次 HFCS 甜味苏打水的人患哮喘的风险增加了 49%(P<0.011),中度饮用苹果汁的人(每周 2-4 次)的风险增加了 61%(P<0.007),中度饮用果汁饮料的人风险增加了 58%(P<0.009),与从不/很少饮用相比。无糖苏打水/橙汁与哮喘无关联。这些关联可能是由于果糖:葡萄糖比例高和果糖吸收不良。减少这些饮料的摄入量的建议可能不足以解决哮喘风险,因为即使是中度摄入这些饮料,包括苹果汁(100%纯果汁),也会出现关联。2009 年,美国特殊补充营养计划为妇女、婴儿和儿童提供的果汁减少,以及 2010-2013 年哮喘发病率(尤其是非西班牙裔黑人儿童)的平稳/下降可能与此相关。需要进一步研究果糖吸收不良的后果。