Department of liver disease, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201508, China.
Department of Infectious Disease, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 27;8(1):5224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23646-2.
We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in 188 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). Liver fibrosis was staged using METAVIR scoring system. Define significant fibrosis as F2-F4, severe fibrosis as F3-F4, and cirrhosis as F4. To predict F2-F4, the AUROC of LSM was higher than that of APRI (0.86 vs 0.73, p = 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.86 vs 0.61, p < 0.001). To predict F4, the AUROC of LSM was also higher than that of APRI (0.93 vs 0.77, p = 0.012) and FIB-4 (0.93 vs 0.64, p < 0.001). Patients with ALT levels 1-2 ULN had higher cut-off values than patients with normal ALT levels for the diagnosis of F2-F4 (6.5 vs 6 kPa) and F4 (10.2 vs 7.8 kPa). Using cut-off values regardless of ALT levels, the diagnostic accuracy of LSM was 81% for F2-F4, and 89% for F4. Applying ALT-stratified cut-off values, the diagnostic accuracy of LSM was 82% for F2-F4, and 86% for F4. In conclusion, LSM is a reliable noninvasive test for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Applying ALT-stratified cut-off values did not enhance diagnostic accuracy of LSM in CHB patients with ALT ≤ 2 ULN.
我们旨在评估 188 例丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)≤2 倍正常值上限(ULN)的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的肝硬度测量(LSM)的诊断准确性。采用 METAVIR 评分系统对肝纤维化进行分期。将显著纤维化定义为 F2-F4,严重纤维化定义为 F3-F4,肝硬化定义为 F4。为预测 F2-F4,LSM 的 AUROC 高于 APRI(0.86 对 0.73,p=0.001)和 FIB-4(0.86 对 0.61,p<0.001)。为预测 F4,LSM 的 AUROC 也高于 APRI(0.93 对 0.77,p=0.012)和 FIB-4(0.93 对 0.64,p<0.001)。ALT 水平为 1-2 ULN 的患者比 ALT 正常的患者具有更高的 F2-F4(6.5 对 6kPa)和 F4(10.2 对 7.8kPa)诊断切点值。使用无论 ALT 水平如何的切点值,LSM 对 F2-F4 的诊断准确性为 81%,对 F4 的诊断准确性为 89%。应用 ALT 分层切点值,LSM 对 F2-F4 的诊断准确性为 82%,对 F4 的诊断准确性为 86%。总之,LSM 是一种可靠的无创性肝纤维化诊断检测方法。在 ALT≤2 ULN 的 CHB 患者中,应用 ALT 分层切点值并不能提高 LSM 的诊断准确性。