Suppr超能文献

与组织学相比, fibroscan 分析乙型或丙型肝炎患者肝纤维化的准确性:一项美国多中心研究。

Accuracy of fibroscan, compared with histology, in analysis of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B or C: a United States multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

St Louis University Liver Center, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):772-9.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.12.014. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver biopsy is invasive and associated with complications, sampling errors, and observer variability. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with FibroScan can be used to immediately assess liver stiffness. We aimed to define optimal levels of liver stiffness to identify patients with chronic viral hepatitis and significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, or cirrhosis.

METHODS

In a prospective, 2-phase study, patients with chronic hepatitis C or B underwent VCTE followed by liver biopsy analysis from January 2005 through May 2008 at 6 centers in the United States. In phase 1 we identified optimal levels of liver stiffness for identification of patients with stage F2-F4 or F4 fibrosis (the development phase, n = 188). In phase 2 we tested these cutoff values in a separate cohort of patients (the validation phase, n = 560). All biopsies were assessed for METAVIR stage by a single pathologist in the phase 1 analysis and by a different pathologist in the phase 2 analysis. Diagnostic performances of VCTE were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses.

RESULTS

In phase 1 of the study, liver stiffness measurements identified patients with ≥ F2 fibrosis with AUROC value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.92) and identified patients with F4 fibrosis with AUROC value of 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.95). Liver stiffness cutoff values (kPa) in phase 1 were 8.4 for ≥ F2 (82% sensitivity, 79% specificity) and 12.8 for F4 (84% sensitivity, 86% specificity). In the phase 2 analysis, the liver stiffness cutoff values identified patients with ≥ F2 fibrosis with 58% sensitivity (P < .0001 vs phase 1) and 75% specificity (nonsignificant difference vs phase 1); they identified patients with F4 fibrosis with 76% sensitivity (P < .0001 vs phase 1) and 85% specificity (nonsignificant differences vs phase 1). VCTE had an interobserver agreement correlation coefficient of 0.98 (n = 26) and an intraobserver agreement correlation coefficient of 0.95 (n = 34).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large U.S. multicenter study, we confirmed that VCTE provides an accurate assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Our findings are similar to those from European and Asian cohorts.

摘要

背景与目的

肝活检具有侵袭性,且与并发症、取样误差和观察者变异性相关。应用 FibroScan 的振动控制瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)可即时评估肝硬度。我们旨在确定肝硬度的最佳水平,以识别慢性病毒性肝炎患者的纤维化分期为 F2-F4 或 F4 纤维化、进展期纤维化、晚期纤维化或肝硬化。

方法

在一项前瞻性、两阶段研究中,2005 年 1 月至 2008 年 5 月,美国 6 家中心的慢性丙型或乙型肝炎患者接受了 VCTE 检查,随后进行了肝活检分析。在第一阶段,我们确定了肝硬度的最佳水平,以识别 METAVIR 分期 F2-F4 或 F4 纤维化的患者(发展阶段,n = 188)。在第二阶段,我们在另一组患者(验证阶段,n = 560)中检验了这些截断值。第一阶段分析中,由一名病理学家评估所有活检的 METAVIR 分期,第二阶段分析中,由另一名病理学家评估。通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUROC)分析评估 VCTE 的诊断性能。

结果

在研究的第一阶段,肝硬度测量值对 ≥ F2 纤维化的患者具有 0.89(95%置信区间,0.83-0.92)的 AUROC 值,对 F4 纤维化的患者具有 0.92(95%置信区间,0.87-0.95)的 AUROC 值。第一阶段的肝硬度截断值(kPa)为:≥ F2 为 8.4(82%的敏感性,79%的特异性),F4 为 12.8(84%的敏感性,86%的特异性)。在第二阶段分析中,肝硬度截断值对 ≥ F2 纤维化的患者的敏感性为 58%(P <.0001 与第一阶段相比),特异性为 75%(与第一阶段相比差异无统计学意义);对 F4 纤维化的患者的敏感性为 76%(P <.0001 与第一阶段相比),特异性为 85%(与第一阶段相比差异无统计学意义)。VCTE 的观察者间一致性相关系数为 0.98(n = 26),观察者内一致性相关系数为 0.95(n = 34)。

结论

在一项大型美国多中心研究中,我们证实 VCTE 可准确评估慢性病毒性肝炎患者的肝纤维化程度。我们的发现与欧洲和亚洲队列的研究结果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验