• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Disease - A Review.冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干疾病的综述
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Mar;8(1):14-18. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.14.
2
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较：外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
3
Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting.左主干冠状动脉狭窄：药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008.
4
Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease in the drug-eluting stent era.药物洗脱支架时代无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局。
Heart. 2012 May;98(10):799-805. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300753. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.当前针对三支血管病变及左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术实践。来自SYNTAX导入期的见解。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.047. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
6
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病：一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
7
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Stenosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Mar 18;21(5):27. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1113-0.
8
Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II.EXCEL 试验中依维莫司洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建效果的长期预测和死亡率比较：SYNTAX 评分 II 的前瞻性验证。
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1231-41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu518. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果：EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
10
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄（NOBLE）：一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Venn diagrams in cardiovascular disease: the Heart Team concept.心血管疾病中的维恩图：心脏团队概念
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Feb;95(2):389-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.06.071. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
2
Choosing methods to minimize confounding in observational studies: do the ends justify the means?在观察性研究中选择方法以尽量减少混杂因素：结果能证明手段合理吗？
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Nov 1;4(6):581-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963538.
3
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南。美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组及心血管造影和介入学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
4
Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies.非紧急情况下左主干支架置入术的手术适应证和选择偏倚：对观察性研究的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Sep;4(9):1020-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.010.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较：随机临床数据的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.005.
6
Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study.前瞻性应用预先定义的血管内超声标准评估中间支左冠状动脉病变：来自多中心 LITRO 研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064.
7
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.比较冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干和/或三血管病变：SYNTAX 试验 3 年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(17):2125-34. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
Validating the EXCEL hypothesis: a propensity score matched 3-year comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in left main patients with SYNTAX score ≤32.验证 EXCEL 假说：SYNTAX 评分≤32 的左主干病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的倾向评分匹配 3 年比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):936-43. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22992. Epub 2011 May 5.
9
Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病支架与旁路手术的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1718-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100452. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
10
Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery.药物洗脱支架置入术或冠状动脉旁路移植术后的生活质量。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1016-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001508.

冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干疾病的综述

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Disease - A Review.

作者信息

McNulty Edward

机构信息

Kaiser San Francisco Medical Center, and Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, US.

出版信息

Interv Cardiol. 2013 Mar;8(1):14-18. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.14.

DOI:10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.14
PMID:29588745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808683/
Abstract

There have been over a dozen studies in the drug-eluting stent era comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. These studies have been both randomised and observational in nature. While both methodologies provide important insights, careful consideration of their respective strengths and limitations is imperative in generalising their findings.

摘要

在药物洗脱支架时代，已经有超过十几项研究比较了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）和冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）治疗无保护左主干病变的有效性。这些研究既有随机对照试验，也有观察性研究。虽然这两种方法都提供了重要的见解，但在推广其研究结果时，必须仔细考虑它们各自的优点和局限性。