Adapt Research Ltd, Reefton, New Zealand.
Department of Public Health, Univeristy of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194811. eCollection 2018.
To compare voice-activated internet searches by smartphone (two digital assistants) with laptop ones for information and advice related to smoking cessation.
Responses to 80 questions on a range of topics related to smoking cessation (including the FAQ from a NHS website), compared for quality.
Smartphone and internet searches as performed in New Zealand.
Ranked responses to the questions.
Google laptop internet searches came first (or first equal) for best quality smoking cessation advice for 83% (66/80) of the responses. Voiced questions to Google Assistant ("OK Google") came first/first equal 76% of the time vs Siri (Apple) at 28%. Google and Google Assistant were statistically significantly better than Siri searches (odds ratio 12.4 and 8.5 respectively, p<0.0001 in each comparison). When asked FAQs from the National Health Service website, or to find information the Centers for Disease Control has made videos on, the best search results used expert sources 59% (31/52) of the time, "some expertise" (eg, Wikipedia) 18% of the time, but also magazines and other low quality sources 19% of the time. Using all three methods failed to find relevant information 8% (6/80) of the time, with Siri having the most failed responses (53% of the time).
Google internet searches and Google Assistant were found to be significantly superior to the Siri digital assistant for smoking cessation information. While expert content was returned over half the time, there is still substantial room for improvement in how these software systems deliver smoking cessation advice.
比较智能手机(两个数字助理)和笔记本电脑的语音激活互联网搜索,以获取与戒烟相关的信息和建议。
比较了一系列与戒烟相关主题(包括 NHS 网站的常见问题解答)的 80 个问题的回答,以评估质量。
在新西兰进行智能手机和互联网搜索。
对问题的回答排名。
对于 80 个回答中的 83%(66/80),Google 笔记本互联网搜索提供的戒烟最佳建议排名第一(或并列第一)。对 Google Assistant(“OK Google”)的语音问题的回答有 76%的时间排名第一/并列第一,而 Siri(苹果)为 28%。Google 和 Google Assistant 的搜索结果明显优于 Siri(优势比分别为 12.4 和 8.5,每次比较的 p 值均<0.0001)。当被问及国家卫生服务网站的常见问题解答,或查找疾病控制中心制作的视频信息时,最佳搜索结果使用专家资源的时间为 59%(31/52),“有一定专业知识”(如维基百科)的时间为 18%,但也有杂志和其他低质量来源的时间为 19%。三种方法都未能找到相关信息的情况占 8%(6/80),其中 Siri 的失败响应最多(53%)。
对于戒烟信息,Google 互联网搜索和 Google Assistant 明显优于 Siri 数字助理。虽然有一半以上的时间返回了专家内容,但这些软件系统提供戒烟建议仍有很大的改进空间。