Suppr超能文献

聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性分析作为初次人乳头瘤病毒检测的一种选择。

PCR-RFLP assay as an option for primary HPV test.

作者信息

Golfetto L, Alves E V, Martins T R, Sincero T C M, Castro J B S, Dannebrock C, Oliveira J G, Levi J E, Onofre A S C, Bazzo M L

机构信息

Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Microbiologia e Sorologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

Laboratório de Virologia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018 Mar 26;51(5):e7098. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20177098.

Abstract

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is an essential factor of cervical cancer. This study evaluated the analytical performance of restriction fragment length polymorphism polymerase chain reaction (PCR-RFLP) assay compared to PapilloCheck® microarray to identify human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical cells. Three hundred and twenty-five women were analyzed. One sample was used for conventional cytology and another sample was collected using BD SurePath™ kit for HPV tests. Eighty samples (24.6%) were positive for HPV gene by PCR-Multiplex and were then submitted to PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck® microarray. There was a genotyping agreement in 71.25% (57/80) on at least one HPV type between PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck® microarray. In 22 samples (27.5%), the results were discordant and those samples were additionally analyzed by DNA sequencing. HPV 16 was the most prevalent HPV type found in both methods, followed by HPVs 53, 68, 18, 39, and 66 using PCR-RFLP analysis, and HPVs 39, 53, 68, 56, 31, and 66 using PapilloCheck® microarray. In the present study, a perfect agreement using Cohen's kappa (κ) was found in HPV 33 and 58 (κ=1), very good for HPV 51, and good for types 16, 18, 53, 59, 66, 68, 70, and 73. PCR-RFLP analysis identified only 25% (20/80) HPV coinfection, and PapilloCheck® microarray found 62.5% (50/80). Our Cohen's kappa results indicate that our in-house HPV genotyping testing (PCR-RFLP analysis) could be applied as a primary HPV test screening, especially in low income countries. If multiple HPV types are found in this primary test, a more descriptive test, such as PapilloCheck® microarray, could be performed.

摘要

持续性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是宫颈癌的关键因素。本研究评估了限制性片段长度多态性聚合酶链反应(PCR-RFLP)检测与PapilloCheck®微阵列相比,用于鉴定宫颈细胞中人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的分析性能。对325名女性进行了分析。一份样本用于传统细胞学检查,另一份样本使用BD SurePath™试剂盒收集用于HPV检测。80份样本(24.6%)经多重PCR检测HPV基因呈阳性,随后进行PCR-RFLP和PapilloCheck®微阵列检测。在至少一种HPV类型上,PCR-RFLP与PapilloCheck®微阵列的基因分型一致性为71.25%(57/80)。22份样本(27.5%)结果不一致,对这些样本进行了DNA测序分析。两种方法中最常见的HPV类型均为HPV 16,其次,PCR-RFLP分析发现的HPV类型依次为53、68、18、39和66,PapilloCheck®微阵列发现的HPV类型依次为39、53、68、56、31和66。在本研究中,HPV 33和58使用Cohen's kappa(κ)得出的一致性极佳(κ=1),HPV 51的一致性很好,HPV 16、18、53、59、66、68、70和73的一致性良好。PCR-RFLP分析仅检测出25%(20/80)的HPV合并感染,而PapilloCheck®微阵列检测出62.5%(50/80)。我们的Cohen's kappa结果表明,我们的内部HPV基因分型检测(PCR-RFLP分析)可作为主要的HPV检测筛查方法,尤其是在低收入国家。如果在初次检测中发现多种HPV类型,则可进行更具描述性的检测,如PapilloCheck®微阵列检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/552e/5886552/b3ee56ab5245/1414-431X-bjmbr-51-5-e7098-gf001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验