Tota Joseph E, Bentley James, Blake Jennifer, Coutlée François, Duggan Máire A, Ferenczy Alex, Franco Eduardo L, Fung-Kee-Fung Michael, Gotlieb Walter, Mayrand Marie-Hélène, McLachlin Meg, Murphy Joan, Ogilvie Gina, Ratnam Sam
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Prev Med. 2017 May;98:5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.029. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Since being introduced in the 1940s, cervical cytology - despite its limitations - has had unequivocal success in reducing cervical cancer burden in many countries. However, we now know that infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer and there is overwhelming evidence from large-scale clinical trials, feasibility studies and real-world experience that supports the introduction of molecular testing for HPV as the primary technology in cervical cancer screening (i.e., "HPV primary screening"). While questions remain about the most appropriate age groups for screening, screening interval and triage approach, these should not be considered barriers to implementation. Many countries are in various stages of adopting HPV primary screening, whereas others have not taken any major steps towards introduction of this approach. As a group of clinical experts and researchers in cervical cancer prevention from across Canada, we have jointly authored this comprehensive examination of the evidence to implement HPV primary screening. Our intention is to create a common understanding among policy makers, agencies, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders about the evidence concerning HPV primary screening to catalyze the adoption of this improved approach to cervical cancer prevention. With the first cohort of vaccinated girls now turning 21, the age when routine screening typically begins, there is increased urgency to introduce HPV primary screening, whose performance may be less adversely affected compared with cervical cytology as a consequence of reduced lesion prevalence post-vaccination.
自20世纪40年代引入以来,宫颈细胞学检查——尽管存在局限性——在许多国家减少宫颈癌负担方面取得了明确的成功。然而,我们现在知道,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是宫颈癌的必要病因,大规模临床试验、可行性研究和实际经验提供了压倒性的证据,支持将HPV分子检测作为宫颈癌筛查的主要技术(即“HPV初筛”)。虽然对于最合适的筛查年龄组、筛查间隔和分流方法仍存在疑问,但这些不应被视为实施的障碍。许多国家正处于采用HPV初筛的不同阶段,而其他国家尚未朝着引入这种方法迈出任何重大步伐。作为一群来自加拿大各地的宫颈癌预防临床专家和研究人员,我们共同撰写了这份关于实施HPV初筛证据的全面审查报告。我们的目的是在政策制定者、机构、临床医生、研究人员和其他利益相关者之间就有关HPV初筛的证据达成共识,以促使采用这种改进的宫颈癌预防方法。随着第一批接种疫苗的女孩现在年满21岁,即常规筛查通常开始的年龄,引入HPV初筛的紧迫性增加,由于接种疫苗后病变患病率降低,与宫颈细胞学检查相比,HPV初筛的性能可能受到的不利影响较小。