• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对9·11事件后退伍军人家庭照顾者的全面支持增加了退伍军人对长期服务和支持的利用:一项倾向得分分析。

Comprehensive Support for Family Caregivers of Post-9/11 Veterans Increases Veteran Utilization of Long-term Services and Supports: A Propensity Score Analysis.

作者信息

Shepherd-Banigan Megan, Smith Valerie A, Stechuchak Karen M, Miller Katherine E M, Hastings Susan Nicole, Wieland Gilbert Darryl, Olsen Maren K, Kabat Margaret, Henius Jennifer, Campbell-Kotler Margaret, Van Houtven Courtney Harold

机构信息

1 Durham VA Medical Center, NC, USA.

2 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018762914. doi: 10.1177/0046958018762914.

DOI:10.1177/0046958018762914
PMID:29591540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5882048/
Abstract

Family caregivers are an important component of the long-term services and supports (LTSS) system. However, caregiving may have negative consequences for caregiver physical and emotional health. Connecting caregivers to formal short-term home- and community-based services (HCBS), through information resources and referrals, might alleviate family caregiver burden and delay nursing home entry for the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early impact of the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) (established by P.L. 111-163 for family caregivers of seriously injured post-9/11 Veterans) on Veteran use of LTSS. A two-cohort pre-post design with a nonequivalent comparison group (treated n = 15 650; comparison n = 8339) was used to (1) examine the association between caregiver enrollment in PCAFC and any VA-purchased or VA-provided LTSS use among Veterans and (2) describe program-related trends in HCBS and institutional LTSS use. The comparison group was an inverse-propensity-score weighted sample of Veterans whose caregivers applied for, but were not accepted into, the program. From baseline through 24 months post application, use of any LTSS ranged from 13.1% to 17.8% for Veterans whose caregivers were enrolled in PCAFC versus from 3.8% to 5.3% for Veterans in the comparison group. Participation in PCAFC was associated with a statistically significant increased use of any LTSS from 1 to 24 months post application (over time odds ratios ranged from 2.71 [95% confidence interval: 2.31-3.17] to 4.86 [3.93-6.02]). Support for family caregivers may enhance utilization of LTSS for Veterans with physical, emotional, and/or cognitive conditions.

摘要

家庭照护者是长期服务与支持(LTSS)系统的重要组成部分。然而,照护工作可能会对照护者的身心健康产生负面影响。通过信息资源和转介服务,将照护者与正规的短期居家和社区服务(HCBS)相联系,可能会减轻家庭照护者的负担,并延缓患者进入养老院的时间。本研究的目的是评估家庭照护者综合援助计划(PCAFC)(由第111-163号公法为9·11事件后重伤退伍军人的家庭照护者设立)对退伍军人使用LTSS的早期影响。采用具有非等效对照组的双队列前后设计(治疗组n = 15650;对照组n = 8339)来:(1)研究照护者参加PCAFC与退伍军人使用任何由退伍军人事务部(VA)购买或提供的LTSS之间的关联;(2)描述与该计划相关的HCBS和机构LTSS使用趋势。对照组是照护者申请但未被该计划录取的退伍军人的逆倾向得分加权样本。从基线到申请后24个月,照护者参加PCAFC的退伍军人使用任何LTSS的比例在13.1%至17.8%之间,而对照组退伍军人的这一比例在3.8%至5.3%之间。参加PCAFC与申请后1至24个月使用任何LTSS的显著增加相关(随时间变化的优势比范围从2.71[95%置信区间:2.31 - 3.17]到4.86[3.93 - 6.02])。对家庭照护者的支持可能会提高身体、情感和/或认知状况不佳的退伍军人对LTSS的利用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/de4d517038f6/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/f47cd1f14538/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/0ddcfa3828d5/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/45e174990488/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/de4d517038f6/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/f47cd1f14538/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/0ddcfa3828d5/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/45e174990488/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b928/5882048/de4d517038f6/10.1177_0046958018762914-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive Support for Family Caregivers of Post-9/11 Veterans Increases Veteran Utilization of Long-term Services and Supports: A Propensity Score Analysis.对9·11事件后退伍军人家庭照顾者的全面支持增加了退伍军人对长期服务和支持的利用:一项倾向得分分析。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018762914. doi: 10.1177/0046958018762914.
2
The Effect of Support and Training for Family Members on Access to Outpatient Services for Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).为患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的退伍军人家庭成员提供支持和培训对其获得门诊服务的影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jul;45(4):550-564. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0844-8.
3
Comprehensive support of family caregivers: Are there health system cost offsets?家庭照料者的综合支持:是否能降低卫生系统成本?
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55(5):710-721. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13312. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
4
Comprehensive Support for Family Caregivers: Impact on Veteran Health Care Utilization and Costs.对家庭照顾者的全面支持:对退伍军人医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Feb;76(1):89-114. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697015. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
5
Short-term effects of comprehensive caregiver supports on caregiver outcomes.综合照顾者支持对照顾者结局的短期影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):140-153. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14038. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
6
Predictors of discharge from the VA Caregiver Support Program.退伍军人事务部照顾者支持计划出院预测因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Aug 1;28(8):e289-e295. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89202.
7
Family Caregivers of Veterans Experience High Levels of Burden, Distress, and Financial Strain.退伍军人的家庭照顾者承受着高负担、痛苦和经济压力。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2675-2683. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16767. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Comprehensive Family Caregiver Support and Caregiver Well-Being: Preliminary Evidence From a Pre-post-survey Study With a Non-equivalent Control Group.全面的家庭照顾者支持与照顾者福祉:来自一项具有非等效对照组的前后调查研究的初步证据。
Front Public Health. 2019 May 22;7:122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00122. eCollection 2019.
9
U.S. Veteran Health Care Utilization Increases after Caregivers' Use of National Caregiver Telephone Support Line.在照顾者使用国家照顾者电话支持热线后,美国退伍军人的医疗保健利用率有所提高。
Health Soc Work. 2017 May 1;42(2):e111-e119. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlx016.
10
Comprehensive Caregiver Supports and Ascertainment and Treatment of Veteran Pain.全面的护理者支持以及退伍军人疼痛的查明与治疗。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Apr;81(2):107-121. doi: 10.1177/10775587231210026. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term effects of comprehensive caregiver supports on caregiver outcomes.综合照顾者支持对照顾者结局的短期影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):140-153. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14038. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
The Measure of the Family Caregivers' Experience.家庭护理者体验的衡量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 18;15(9):2040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092040.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Support for Family Caregivers: Impact on Veteran Health Care Utilization and Costs.对家庭照顾者的全面支持:对退伍军人医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Feb;76(1):89-114. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697015. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
2
Hidden Heroes: America's Military Caregivers - Executive Summary.无名英雄:美国军事护理人员——执行摘要
Rand Health Q. 2014 Jun 1;4(2):14. eCollection 2014 Summer.
3
Effectiveness of respite care in supporting informal caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review.喘息服务对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的支持效果:一项系统评价。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;31(12):1277-1288. doi: 10.1002/gps.4504. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
4
Risk Adjustment Tools for Learning Health Systems: A Comparison of DxCG and CMS-HCC V21.学习型健康系统的风险调整工具:DxCG与CMS-HCC V21的比较
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):2002-19. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12454. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
The causal effects of home care use on institutional long-term care utilization and expenditures.家庭护理使用对机构长期护理利用率和支出的因果效应。
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:4-17. doi: 10.1002/hec.3155.
6
Quantifying long-term care preferences.量化长期护理偏好。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):106-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551641. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
7
Caregiver burden: a clinical review.照顾者负担:临床综述。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304.
8
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Comparison of the performance of the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk adjuster with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures in predicting mortality.比较 CMS 层次条件类别(CMS-HCC)风险调整器与 Charlson 和 Elixhauser 合并症测量在预测死亡率方面的性能。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 20;10:245. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-245.
10
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.