Balliet Daniel, Tybur Joshua M, Wu Junhui, Antonellis Christian, Van Lange Paul A M
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J Conflict Resolut. 2018 Apr;62(4):797-818. doi: 10.1177/0022002716658694. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
Theories suggest that political ideology relates to cooperation, with conservatives being more likely to pursue selfish outcomes, and liberals more likely to pursue egalitarian outcomes. In study 1, we examine how political ideology and political party affiliation (Republican vs. Democrat) predict cooperation with a partner who self-identifies as Republican or Democrat in two samples before ( = 362) and after ( = 366) the 2012 US presidential election. Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners' outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis ( = .15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members. We discuss the relation between political ideology and cooperation within and between groups.
理论表明,政治意识形态与合作相关,保守派更有可能追求自私的结果,而自由派更有可能追求平等主义的结果。在研究1中,我们考察了政治意识形态和政党归属(共和党人与民主党人)如何在2012年美国总统大选之前(N = 362)和之后(N = 366)的两个样本中预测与自我认同为共和党人或民主党人的伙伴的合作。与保守派相比,自由派对伙伴的结果表现出略多的关注(研究1),在研究2中,这种关系得到了元分析的支持(r = 0.15)。然而,在研究1中,总体而言政治意识形态与合作并无关联。相对于外群体,共和党人和民主党人都对自己的内群体给予更多合作,这可以通过对内群体与外群体成员合作的预期来解释。我们讨论了群体内部和群体之间政治意识形态与合作的关系。