Young Dannagal G, Maloney Erin K, Bleakley Amy, Langbaum Jessica
Departments of Communication and Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
J Soc Polit Psychol. 2022;10(2):643-656. doi: 10.5964/jspp.7823. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
This project examines the intersection of political constructs and epistemic motivations as they relate to belief in misinformation. How we value the origins of knowledge - through feelings and intuition or evidence and data - has important implications for our susceptibility to misinformation. This project explores how these epistemic motivations correlate with political ideology, party identification, and favorability towards President Trump, and how epistemic and political constructs predict belief in misinformation about COVID and the 2020 election. Results from a US national survey from Nov-Dec 2020 illustrate that Republicans, conservatives, and those favorable towards President Trump held greater misperceptions about COVID and the 2020 election. Additionally, epistemic motivations were associated with political preferences; Republicans and conservatives were more likely to reject evidence, and Trump supporters more likely to value feelings and intuition. Mediation analyses support the proposition that Trump favorability, Republicanism, and conservatism may help account for the relationships between epistemic motivations and misperceptions. Results are discussed in terms of the messaging strategies of right-wing populist movements, and the implications for democracy and public health.
本项目考察政治建构与认知动机的交叉点,因为它们与错误信息的信念相关。我们如何通过情感和直觉或证据和数据来重视知识的起源,对我们受错误信息影响的程度具有重要意义。本项目探讨这些认知动机如何与政治意识形态、政党认同以及对特朗普总统的好感度相关联,以及认知和政治建构如何预测对有关新冠疫情和2020年选举的错误信息的信念。2020年11月至12月美国全国性调查的结果表明,共和党人、保守派以及对特朗普总统有好感的人对新冠疫情和2020年选举存在更大的误解。此外,认知动机与政治偏好相关;共和党人和保守派更有可能拒绝证据,而特朗普的支持者更有可能重视情感和直觉。中介分析支持这样一种观点,即对特朗普的好感度、共和主义和保守主义可能有助于解释认知动机与误解之间的关系。将根据右翼民粹主义运动的信息传递策略以及对民主和公共卫生的影响来讨论研究结果。