• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.“我凭直觉感觉到:”认知动机、政治信仰以及对新冠疫情和2020年美国总统大选的误解
J Soc Polit Psychol. 2022;10(2):643-656. doi: 10.5964/jspp.7823. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Constituents' Inferences of Local Governments' Goals and the Relationship Between Political Party and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation: Cross-sectional Survey of Twitter Followers of State Public Health Departments.地方政府目标的选民推断以及政党与新冠疫情错误信息中的信念之间的关系:对州公共卫生部门推特关注者的横断面调查
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 10;2(1):e29246. doi: 10.2196/29246. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
3
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
4
The politics of mask-wearing: Political preferences, reactance, and conflict aversion during COVID.戴口罩的政治:新冠疫情期间的政治倾向、逆反心理和冲突规避。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114836. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114836. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans Democrats during a US National Election.政治意识形态、信任与合作:美国全国选举期间共和党人和民主党人之间的内群体偏袒
J Conflict Resolut. 2018 Apr;62(4):797-818. doi: 10.1177/0022002716658694. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
6
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.处理政治错误信息:理解特朗普现象。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 1;4(3):160802. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160802. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.认知反思与 2016 年美国总统大选
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Feb;45(2):224-239. doi: 10.1177/0146167218783192. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Individual Differences in Belief in Fake News about Election Fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election.2020年美国大选后关于选举舞弊的虚假新闻中的个体差异。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;11(12):175. doi: 10.3390/bs11120175.
9
The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada.特朗普效应?加拿大的右翼民粹主义与对邮寄投票的不信任
Public Opin Q. 2024 Jul 16;88(SI):781-813. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfae020. eCollection 2024.
10
Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.象征性的权力丧失与唐纳德·特朗普 2016 年总统大选:拉丁裔和白人群体的心理健康反应。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114417. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114417. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Continued influence of false accusations in forming impressions of political candidates.不实指控在形成对政治候选人的印象方面的持续影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Nov 1;3(11):pgae490. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae490. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Factors associated with COVID-19 masking behavior: an application of the Health Belief Model.与 COVID-19 口罩行为相关的因素:健康信念模型的应用。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Nov 21;37(6):452-465. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac031.

本文引用的文献

1
Not just conspiracy theories: Vaccine opponents and proponents add to the COVID-19 'infodemic' on Twitter.不只是阴谋论:疫苗反对者和支持者加剧了推特上关于新冠疫情的“信息疫情”。
Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev. 2020 Sep;1. doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-38. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Conservatives' susceptibility to political misperceptions.保守派人士对政治错误认知的易感性。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 2;7(23). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1234. Print 2021 Jun.
3
Relationship between political partisanship and COVID-19 deaths: future implications for public health.政治党派与 COVID-19 死亡之间的关系:对公共卫生的未来影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):716-723. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab136.
4
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596. eCollection 2021.
5
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Thinking Preferences and Conspiracy Belief: Intuitive Thinking and the Jumping to Conclusions-Bias as a Basis for the Belief in Conspiracy Theories.思维偏好与阴谋论信念:直觉思维以及急于下结论偏差作为相信阴谋论的基础
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 18;11:568942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568942. eCollection 2020.
7
Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors' recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States.政治党派偏见影响美国民众对州长新冠防疫建议的行为反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24144-24153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic.两极分化与公共卫生:新冠疫情期间社会 distancing 方面的党派差异。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但原文中该词似乎有误,可能是“social distancing measures”之类表述会更准确,直接翻译的话就是“社会距离” )
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
The confident conservative: Ideological differences in judgment and decision-making confidence.自信的保守派:判断和决策信心中的意识形态差异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):527-544. doi: 10.1037/xge0000898. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science.科学相关的民粹主义:概念化民粹主义对科学的要求。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jul;29(5):473-491. doi: 10.1177/0963662520924259. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

“我凭直觉感觉到:”认知动机、政治信仰以及对新冠疫情和2020年美国总统大选的误解

"I feel it in my gut:" Epistemic Motivations, Political Beliefs, and Misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.

作者信息

Young Dannagal G, Maloney Erin K, Bleakley Amy, Langbaum Jessica

机构信息

Departments of Communication and Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

Department of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Polit Psychol. 2022;10(2):643-656. doi: 10.5964/jspp.7823. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.5964/jspp.7823
PMID:36960233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10031655/
Abstract

This project examines the intersection of political constructs and epistemic motivations as they relate to belief in misinformation. How we value the origins of knowledge - through feelings and intuition or evidence and data - has important implications for our susceptibility to misinformation. This project explores how these epistemic motivations correlate with political ideology, party identification, and favorability towards President Trump, and how epistemic and political constructs predict belief in misinformation about COVID and the 2020 election. Results from a US national survey from Nov-Dec 2020 illustrate that Republicans, conservatives, and those favorable towards President Trump held greater misperceptions about COVID and the 2020 election. Additionally, epistemic motivations were associated with political preferences; Republicans and conservatives were more likely to reject evidence, and Trump supporters more likely to value feelings and intuition. Mediation analyses support the proposition that Trump favorability, Republicanism, and conservatism may help account for the relationships between epistemic motivations and misperceptions. Results are discussed in terms of the messaging strategies of right-wing populist movements, and the implications for democracy and public health.

摘要

本项目考察政治建构与认知动机的交叉点,因为它们与错误信息的信念相关。我们如何通过情感和直觉或证据和数据来重视知识的起源,对我们受错误信息影响的程度具有重要意义。本项目探讨这些认知动机如何与政治意识形态、政党认同以及对特朗普总统的好感度相关联,以及认知和政治建构如何预测对有关新冠疫情和2020年选举的错误信息的信念。2020年11月至12月美国全国性调查的结果表明,共和党人、保守派以及对特朗普总统有好感的人对新冠疫情和2020年选举存在更大的误解。此外,认知动机与政治偏好相关;共和党人和保守派更有可能拒绝证据,而特朗普的支持者更有可能重视情感和直觉。中介分析支持这样一种观点,即对特朗普的好感度、共和主义和保守主义可能有助于解释认知动机与误解之间的关系。将根据右翼民粹主义运动的信息传递策略以及对民主和公共卫生的影响来讨论研究结果。