Tracey Andrew T, Eun Daniel D, Stifelman Michael D, Hemal Ashok K, Stein Robert J, Mottrie Alexandre, Cadeddu Jeffrey A, Stolzenburg J Uwe, Berger Andre K, Buffi Niccolò, Zhao Lee C, Lee Ziho, Hampton Lance, Porpiglia Francesco, Autorino Riccardo
Division of Urology, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Jun;70(3):231-241. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03137-5. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
Iatrogenic ureteral injuries represent a common surgical problem encountered by practicing urologists. With the rapidly expanding applications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, ureteral reconstruction has been an important field of recent advancement. This collaborative review sought to provide an evidence-based analysis of the latest surgical techniques and outcomes for robotic-assisted repair of ureteral injury.
A systematic review of the literature up to December 2017 using PubMed/Medline was performed to identify relevant articles. Those studies included in the systematic review were selected according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis criteria. Additionally, expert opinions were included from study authors in order to critique outcomes and elaborate on surgical techniques. A cumulative outcome analysis was conducted analyzing comparative studies on robotic versus open ureteral repair.
Thirteen case series have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and success of robotic ureteral reconstruction. The surgical planning, timing of intervention, and various robotic reconstructive techniques need to be tailored to the specific case, depending on the location and length of the injury. Fluorescence imaging can represent a useful tool in this setting. Recently, three studies have shown the feasibility and technical success of robotic buccal mucosa grafting for ureteral repair. Soon, additional novel and experimental robotic reconstructive approaches might become available. The cumulative analysis of the three available comparative studies on robotic versus open ureteral repair showed no difference in operative time or complication rate, with a decreased blood loss and hospital length of stay favoring the robotic approach.
Current evidence suggests that the robotic surgical platform facilitates complex ureteral reconstruction in a minimally invasive fashion. High success rates of ureteral repair using the robotic approach mirror those of open surgery, with the additional advantage of faster recovery. Novel techniques in development and surgical adjuncts show promise as the role of robotic surgery evolves.
医源性输尿管损伤是执业泌尿科医生常见的手术问题。随着机器人辅助腹腔镜手术应用的迅速扩展,输尿管重建已成为近期进展的一个重要领域。本协作综述旨在对机器人辅助修复输尿管损伤的最新手术技术和结果进行循证分析。
使用PubMed/Medline对截至2017年12月的文献进行系统综述,以确定相关文章。纳入系统综述的研究根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目标准进行选择。此外,还纳入了研究作者的专家意见,以评估结果并详细阐述手术技术。对机器人与开放输尿管修复的比较研究进行了累积结果分析。
13个病例系列已证明机器人输尿管重建的可行性、安全性和成功率。手术规划、干预时机和各种机器人重建技术需要根据具体病例进行调整,这取决于损伤的位置和长度。荧光成像在这种情况下可能是一种有用的工具。最近,三项研究显示了机器人颊黏膜移植用于输尿管修复的可行性和技术成功率。不久,可能会有更多新颖的实验性机器人重建方法。对三项现有的机器人与开放输尿管修复比较研究的累积分析显示,手术时间或并发症发生率没有差异,机器人手术方法在减少失血和缩短住院时间方面具有优势。
目前的证据表明,机器人手术平台以微创方式促进复杂的输尿管重建。使用机器人手术方法进行输尿管修复的高成功率与开放手术相当,且具有恢复更快的额外优势。随着机器人手术作用的发展,正在开发的新技术和手术辅助工具显示出前景。