Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Nagoya and Okayama, Japan.
From the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School; the Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4):1056-1062. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004246.
A well-organized, thoughtful study design is essential for creating an impactful study. However, pressures promoting high output from researchers can lead to rushed study proposals that overlook critical weaknesses in the study design that can affect the validity of the conclusions. Researchers can benefit from thorough review of past failed proposals when crafting new research ideas. Conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis are two innovative techniques that can be used during study development to identify flaws and prevent study failures. In addition, conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis can be combined to complement each other to provide both a big picture and detailed view of a study proposal. This article describes these two common analytical methods and provides an example of how they can be used to evaluate and improve a study design by critically examining a previous failed research idea.
一个组织良好、深思熟虑的研究设计对于创建有影响力的研究至关重要。然而,促使研究人员高产的压力可能导致匆忙提出研究建议,从而忽略了研究设计中可能影响结论有效性的关键弱点。研究人员可以从精心审查过去失败的提案中受益,从而形成新的研究思路。概念框架和根本原因分析是在研究开发过程中可以用来识别缺陷并防止研究失败的两种创新技术。此外,概念框架和根本原因分析可以结合使用,互为补充,提供研究建议的整体和详细视图。本文描述了这两种常见的分析方法,并通过批判性地检查以前失败的研究思路,提供了一个如何使用它们来评估和改进研究设计的示例。