• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨影响农民对计划中的适应方案支付意愿(WTP)的因素,以应对农业部门的气候问题。

Exploring factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors.

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(12):9494-504. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x
PMID:25613801
Abstract

This study empirically estimates farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme for addressing climate issues in Pakistan's agricultural sectors. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was employed to determine a monetary valuation of farmers' preferences for a planned adaptation programme by ascertaining the value attached to address climatic issues. The survey was conducted by distributing structured questionnaires among Pakistani farmers. The study found that 67 % of respondents were willing to pay for a planned adaptation programme. However, several socioeconomic and motivational factors exert greater influence on their willingness to pay (WTP). This paper specifies the steps needed for all institutional bodies to better address issues in climate change. The outcomes of this paper will support attempts by policy makers to design an efficient adaptation framework for mitigating and adapting to the adverse impacts of climate change.

摘要

本研究通过实证估计了农民对计划中的适应方案的支付意愿(WTP),以应对巴基斯坦农业部门的气候问题。本研究采用条件价值评估法(CVM)来确定农民对计划中的适应方案的偏好的货币价值,从而确定解决气候问题的附加价值。该调查通过向巴基斯坦农民分发结构化问卷进行。研究发现,67%的受访者愿意为计划中的适应方案付费。然而,一些社会经济和动机因素对他们的支付意愿(WTP)有更大的影响。本文明确了所有机构都需要采取的步骤,以更好地应对气候变化问题。本文的研究结果将支持政策制定者为设计一个有效的适应框架以减轻和适应气候变化的不利影响而做出的努力。

相似文献

1
Exploring factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors.探讨影响农民对计划中的适应方案支付意愿(WTP)的因素,以应对农业部门的气候问题。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(12):9494-504. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
2
Estimating farmers' willingness to pay for climate change adaptation: the case of the Malaysian agricultural sector.评估农民为适应气候变化的支付意愿:以马来西亚农业部门为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):38. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4254-z. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
3
Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Health Risk Reductions of Pesticide Use in China: A Contingent Valuation Study.中国农民对降低农药使用健康风险的支付意愿:一项条件价值评估研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 29;15(4):625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040625.
4
Farmers' willingness to pay for less health risks by pesticide use: A case study from the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan.农民对通过减少农药使用来降低健康风险的支付意愿:来自巴基斯坦旁遮普省棉区的案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Oct 15;530-531:297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.110. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
Farmers' Perceptions of Climate Variability and Factors Influencing Adaptation: Evidence from Anhui and Jiangsu, China.农民对气候变异性的认知及影响适应的因素:来自中国安徽和江苏的证据
Environ Manage. 2016 May;57(5):976-86. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0661-y. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Factors Influencing Smallholder Farmers' Climate Change Perceptions: A Study from Farmers in Ethiopia.影响小农户气候变化认知的因素:来自埃塞俄比亚农户的一项研究
Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):343-58. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0708-0. Epub 2016 May 14.
7
Climate change adaptation impact on cash crop productivity and income in Punjab province of Pakistan.气候变化对巴基斯坦旁遮普省经济作物生产力和收入的适应影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(24):30767-30777. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09368-x. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Farmers' perceptions of climate change and adaptation behavior in Wushen Banner, China.农民对气候变化的感知与适应行为研究——以中国乌审旗为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(21):26484-26494. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09048-w. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Assessing farmers' perspectives on climate change for effective farm-level adaptation measures in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.评估巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省农民对气候变化的看法,以制定有效的农场层面适应措施。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Aug 7;191(9):547. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7651-5.
10
Rural Farmers' Cognition and Climate Change Adaptation Impact on Cash Crop Productivity: Evidence from a Recent Study.农村农民对气候变化的认知及对经济作物生产力的适应影响:基于一项近期研究的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 1;19(19):12556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912556.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing enablers of e-waste management in circular economy using DEMATEL method: An Indian perspective.利用 DEMATEL 方法评估循环经济中的电子废物管理促进因素:印度视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13325-13338. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07765-w. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants.改善韩国水基础设施的社会效益:升级污水处理厂。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):11202-11212. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07733-4. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Why environmental and social benefits should be included in cost-benefit analysis of infrastructure?

本文引用的文献

1
Water quality perceptions and willingness to pay for clean water in peri-urban Cambodian communities.柬埔寨城郊社区对水质的认知与对清洁水的支付意愿。
J Water Health. 2013 Sep;11(3):489-506. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.212.
2
Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research.洪水风险的感知和沟通:实证研究的系统综述。
Risk Anal. 2013 Jan;33(1):24-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述。
为什么要将环境和社会效益纳入基础设施的成本效益分析中?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21693-21703. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05475-6. Epub 2019 May 26.
4
Cross-Strait climate change and agricultural product loss.海峡两岸气候变化与农产品损失。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):12908-12921. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05166-2. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
Influencing the agricultural sector to embrace adaptation to climate change, for the sake of global food security.为了全球粮食安全,影响农业部门接受适应气候变化的措施。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 May;23(9):9245-6. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6169-4. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
4
Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States.美国多年生生物能源作物的直接气候效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108(11):4307-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008779108. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
5
Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.全球人类水安全和河流生物多样性面临的威胁。
Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):555-61. doi: 10.1038/nature09440.
6
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.气候变化研究与评估的新一代情景。
Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):747-56. doi: 10.1038/nature08823.
7
Managing forests for climate change mitigation.为减缓气候变化而管理森林。
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1456-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1155458.
8
Adapting agriculture to climate change.使农业适应气候变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19691-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701890104. Epub 2007 Dec 6.