Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Large Scale Food Fortification Initiative, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 29;10(4):430. doi: 10.3390/nu10040430.
Progress of national Universal Salt Iodization (USI) strategies is typically assessed by household coverage of adequately iodized salt and median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) in spot urine collections. However, household coverage does not inform on the iodized salt used in preparation of processed foods outside homes, nor does the total UIC reflect the portion of population iodine intake attributable to the USI strategy. This study used data from three population-representative surveys of women of reproductive age (WRA) in Kenya, Senegal and India to develop and illustrate a new approach to apportion the population UIC levels by the principal dietary sources of iodine intake, namely native iodine, iodine in processed food salt and iodine in household salt. The technique requires measurement of urinary sodium concentrations (UNaC) in the same spot urine samples collected for iodine status assessment. Taking into account the different complex survey designs of each survey, generalized linear regression (GLR) analyses were performed in which the UIC data of WRA was set as the outcome variable that depends on their UNaC and household salt iodine (SI) data as explanatory variables. Estimates of the UIC portions that correspond to iodine intake sources were calculated with use of the intercept and regression coefficients for the UNaC and SI variables in each country's regression equation. GLR coefficients for UNaC and SI were significant in all country-specific models. Rural location did not show a significant association in any country when controlled for other explanatory variables. The estimated UIC portion from native dietary iodine intake in each country fell below the minimum threshold for iodine sufficiency. The UIC portion arising from processed food salt in Kenya was substantially higher than in Senegal and India, while the UIC portions from household salt use varied in accordance with the mean level of household SI content in the country surveys. The UIC portions and all-salt-derived iodine intakes found in this study were illustrative of existing differences in national USI legislative frameworks and national salt supply situations between countries. The approach of apportioning the population UIC from spot urine collections may be useful for future monitoring of change in iodine nutrition from reduced salt use in processed foods and in households.
通常,通过家庭对足够碘盐的覆盖率以及对随机尿样中尿碘中位数(UIC)的评估,来衡量国家全民食盐碘化(USI)策略的进展。然而,家庭覆盖率并不能说明家庭以外制备加工食品中所使用的碘盐情况,UIC 总量也不能反映碘摄入量归因于 USI 策略的那部分人群。本研究利用肯尼亚、塞内加尔和印度三个具有代表性的育龄妇女(WRA)人群调查数据,开发并阐述了一种新方法,通过碘的主要膳食来源来分配人群 UIC 水平,这些来源分别是:内源性碘、加工食品盐中的碘和家庭用盐中的碘。该技术需要在评估碘状况的相同随机尿样中测量尿钠浓度(UNaC)。考虑到每个调查的复杂调查设计不同,进行了广义线性回归(GLR)分析,其中 WRA 的 UIC 数据被设定为因变量,取决于他们的 UNaC 和家庭用盐碘(SI)数据作为解释变量。通过使用每个国家回归方程中 UNaC 和 SI 变量的截距和回归系数,计算与碘摄入量来源相对应的 UIC 部分的估计值。在所有国家特定模型中,UNaC 和 SI 的 GLR 系数均具有统计学意义。在控制其他解释变量的情况下,农村地区在任何国家都没有显示出显著的相关性。每个国家的内源性饮食碘摄入量的估计 UIC 部分低于碘充足的最低阈值。肯尼亚的加工食品盐中产生的 UIC 部分明显高于塞内加尔和印度,而家庭用盐使用产生的 UIC 部分则根据国家调查中家庭 SI 含量的平均值而变化。本研究中发现的 UIC 部分和全盐碘摄入量,说明了各国之间现有的 USI 立法框架和国家盐供应情况的差异。从随机尿样中分配人群 UIC 的方法可能有助于未来监测减少加工食品和家庭用盐对碘营养的变化。