Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, PR China.
Department of Medical Oncology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Oral Oncol. 2018 Apr;79:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
This study aimed at identifying the optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
We identified eligible patients with newly-diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC (excluding T3N0) between September 2009 and May 2015. Survival outcomes and grade 3-4 toxicities were compared between different IC regimen groups.
In total, 3738 patients were eligible for this study, with 1572 (42.1%), 1085 (29.0%) and 1081 (28.9%) receiving TPF, PF and TP, respectively. In the whole population, multivariate analysis found that TPF seems to be better than PF and TP. Howerver, subgroup analysis revealed TPF and TP had same effectiveness in patients receiving a cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) ≥200mg/m in concurrent chemotherapy, while TPF shows relatively better survival benefit in patients receiving CCD<200mg/m. Grade 3-4 toxicities were similar between TPF and TP groups, but were relatively higher than that in PF group.
Our study concluded that induction TP regimen may be enough for patients receiving a CCD≥200mg/m, while TPF may be superior to TP and PF for patients receiving a CCD<200mg/m, although grade 3-4 toxic events were more common but tolerable. Further studies are needed to validate our findings.
本研究旨在确定适用于调强放疗治疗的局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的最佳诱导化疗方案。
我们筛选了 2009 年 9 月至 2015 年 5 月间新诊断为 III-IVA 期 NPC(不包括 T3N0)的符合条件的患者。比较了不同 IC 方案组之间的生存结局和 3-4 级毒性。
共有 3738 例患者符合本研究条件,分别接受 TPF、PF 和 TP 治疗的患者比例为 1572(42.1%)、1085(29.0%)和 1081(28.9%)。多变量分析发现,TPF 似乎优于 PF 和 TP,但亚组分析显示,在同期化疗中接受累积顺铂剂量(CCD)≥200mg/m 的患者中,TPF 和 TP 的疗效相同,而在接受 CCD<200mg/m 的患者中,TPF 具有更好的生存获益。TPF 和 TP 组的 3-4 级毒性与 PF 组相似,但相对较高。
本研究认为,对于接受 CCD≥200mg/m 的患者,诱导 TP 方案可能已足够,而对于接受 CCD<200mg/m 的患者,TPF 可能优于 TP 和 PF,尽管 3-4 级毒性事件更常见但可耐受。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的发现。