Suppr超能文献

三种诱导化疗方案治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效与毒性:10年随访结果

Efficacy and Toxicity of Three Induction Chemotherapy Regimens in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Outcomes of 10-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Peng Hao, Chen Binbin, He Shuiqing, Tian Li, Huang Ying

机构信息

Center for Translational Medicine, Precision Medicine Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 14;11:765378. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.765378. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the 10-year survival outcomes of induction docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF), docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP), and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) regimens additional to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage III-IVA NPC were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance prognostic covariates. Survival outcomes and toxicities between different groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 855 patients between 2009 and 2012 were included, with 395 (46.2%), 258 (30.2%), and 202 (23.6%) receiving TPF plus CRT, TP plus CRT, and PF plus CRT regimens, respectively. After a median follow-up of 111.8 months, multivariate analysis both in the whole cohort and PSM selected 202 pairs showed that TPF plus CRT and TP plus CRT achieved significantly better 10-year overall survival (OS) than PF plus CRT. Sensitivity analysis after excluding patients with T3-4N0 disease demonstrated that TPF plus CRT still achieved significantly better OS than PF plus CRT (HR, 0.580; 95% CI, 0.395-0.852; = 0.005), while the difference between TP plus CRT and PF plus CRT was marginally significant (HR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.503-1.008; = 0.056). With regard to toxicity profile, PF regimen achieved the lowest grade 3-5 toxicities (27.3%).

CONCLUSION

TPF plus CRT and TP plus CRT were better than PF plus CRT in improving the 10-year OS of patients with stage III-IVA NPC.

摘要

背景/目的:我们旨在比较诱导多西他赛联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)、多西他赛联合顺铂(TP)以及顺铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)方案序贯同期放化疗(CRT)用于局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的10年生存结局。

方法

纳入新诊断为III-IVA期NPC的合格患者。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡预后协变量。比较不同组之间的生存结局和毒性。

结果

2009年至2012年共纳入855例患者,分别有395例(46.2%)、258例(30.2%)和202例(23.6%)接受TPF联合CRT、TP联合CRT以及PF联合CRT方案。中位随访111.8个月后,全队列和PSM筛选出的202对患者的多因素分析显示,TPF联合CRT和TP联合CRT的10年总生存期(OS)显著优于PF联合CRT。排除T3-4N0疾病患者后的敏感性分析表明,TPF联合CRT的OS仍显著优于PF联合CRT(风险比[HR],0.580;95%置信区间[CI],0.395-0.852;P = 0.005),而TP联合CRT与PF联合CRT之间的差异接近显著(HR,0.712;95% CI,0.503-1.008;P = 0.056)。关于毒性特征,PF方案的3-5级毒性最低(27.3%)。

结论

TPF联合CRT和TP联合CRT在改善III-IVA期NPC患者的10年OS方面优于PF联合CRT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4262/8551638/e0cfc2deb82c/fonc-11-765378-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验