• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证糖尿病健康素养量表作为具有标准设定程序的准则参照测试的有效性。

Validation of the health literacy scale for diabetes as a criterion-referenced test with standard setting procedures.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Daegu University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Department of Diabetes Education, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1468-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.013
PMID:29598965
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Korean Health Literacy Scale for Diabetes Mellitus (KHLS-DM), and to establish reasonable cutoff scores.

METHODS

Initially, 299 items were generated to measure diabetes-related words, numeracy, and information utilization. Content validity assessment and preliminary tests were conducted. After exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Rasch analysis, the remaining 65 items were administered to a quota sample of 500 diabetic patients aged 40-74 years. The items were narrowed down to 58 items based on an item fit index. To obtain cutoff scores, Jaeger's method and the Bookmark method were employed.

RESULTS

A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed, and a three-factor model was supported (χ/df = 3.891, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.04). The overall scores ranged from 0 to 58, and two cutoff points were established. The scale exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The KHLS-DM is a reliable and valid measure with cutoff points to classify individuals into three groups (adequate, marginal, and inadequate).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The standard setting may be useful for researchers to validate health literacy measures in other countries and populations.

摘要

目的

研制并检验《韩国糖尿病健康素养量表》(KHLS-DM)的心理测量学特性,并建立合理的截断分数。

方法

最初生成了 299 个项目来测量与糖尿病相关的词汇、计算能力和信息利用。进行了内容效度评估和初步测试。在探索性因子分析(EFA)和 Rasch 分析后,对 500 名年龄在 40-74 岁的糖尿病患者进行了剩余 65 个项目的配额样本测试。根据项目拟合指数,将项目数量缩小到 58 个。为了获得截断分数,采用了 Jaeger 法和书签法。

结果

进行了验证性因子分析(CFA),支持三因素模型(χ/df=3.891,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.04)。总分范围为 0 至 58,确定了两个截断点。该量表具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.83)。

结论

KHLS-DM 是一种可靠有效的测量工具,具有截断点,可以将个体分为三组(足够、边缘和不足)。

实践意义

标准设定可能对研究人员在其他国家和人群中验证健康素养测量工具有用。

相似文献

1
Validation of the health literacy scale for diabetes as a criterion-referenced test with standard setting procedures.验证糖尿病健康素养量表作为具有标准设定程序的准则参照测试的有效性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1468-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
First-order vs. second-order structural validity of the Health Literacy Scale in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者健康素养量表的一阶与二阶结构效度
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar;32(1):441-447. doi: 10.1111/scs.12460. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
3
Development of the short form of the Korean Health Literacy Scale for the elderly.《韩国老年人健康素养量表短式版的编制》
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Oct;36(5):524-34. doi: 10.1002/nur.21556. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
4
Validation of a combined health literacy and numeracy instrument for patients with type 2 diabetes.验证一种用于 2 型糖尿病患者的综合健康素养和计算能力工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1846-1851. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 20.
5
Measuring cancer caregiver health literacy: Validation of the Health Literacy of Caregivers Scale-Cancer (HLCS-C) in an Australian population.测量癌症护理者的健康素养:澳大利亚人群中护理者健康素养量表-癌症版(HLCS-C)的验证
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):330-344. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12524. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
Validation of a Short Form for Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology.使用触屏语音技术验证健康素养评估的简短形式。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Oct 8;4(4):e200-e207. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200909-01.
8
Chinese health literacy scale for tuberculosis patients: a study on development and psychometric testing.中文结核病患者健康素养量表的编制及心理测量学检验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4168-z.
9
Testing health literacy skills in older Korean adults.测试老年韩国成年人的健康素养技能。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
10
Being an Informed Consumer of Health Information and Assessment of Electronic Health Literacy in a National Sample of Internet Users: Validity and Reliability of the e-HLS Instrument.成为健康信息的明智消费者并在全国互联网用户样本中评估电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表(e-HLS)的有效性和可靠性
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 11;18(7):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5496.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationships Among Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Self-Management, and HbA1c Levels in Older Adults with Diabetes in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.韩国老年糖尿病患者的健康素养、自我效能感、自我管理与糖化血红蛋白水平之间的关系:一项横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Jan 30;17:409-418. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S448056. eCollection 2024.
2
The Brief Health Literacy Scale for Adults: Adaptation and Validation of the Health Literacy for School-Aged Children Questionnaire.成人简易健康素养量表:学龄儿童健康素养问卷的改编和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;20(22):7071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227071.
3
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.
测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.
4
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review.糖尿病患者报告结局测量量表的测量特性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 13;23(8):e25002. doi: 10.2196/25002.