• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突出项目的自上而下优先级排序可能会产生所谓的刺激驱动捕获。

Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.

作者信息

Benoni Hanna

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon LeZion, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 23;9:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218
PMID:29599731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5863530/
Abstract

The current study proposes that top-down attentional prioritization of salient items may produce the so-called stimulus-driven capture. To test this proposal, the "" was designed on the basis of a visual search task. In Experiment 1, a task-irrelevant singleton frame was presented at the same location in 70% of the trials. The target was either presented at chance level within the singleton location, or away from it. In line with the singleton capture phenomenon, participants were faster in identifying the target when it appeared in the singleton location compared to non-singleton locations. However, leaving out the singleton frame in 30% of the trials led to a similar effect; participants were faster in identifying the target when it appeared in the expected singleton location compared to expected non-singletons locations (a "quasi-capture" effect). These results suggest that the participants allocated their attention to the expected singleton location, rather than that the singleton itself captured attention. In Experiment 2, the same task-irrelevant color singleton was presented in a random position in 70% of the trials. This color frame was shown as a non-singleton in all of the 30% singleton-absent multicolored trials. A similar facilitation effect was obtained when the target appeared in the expected singleton color frame compared to other frames, in singleton-absent trials as in singleton-present trials. These results further support the idea that instances of singleton capture can be explained by top-down attentional shifts toward singleton items. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed. Mostly, the study calls to consider the possibility that all sources of attentional control may be represented by a continuous variable of top-down control, including the category of "physical salience."

摘要

当前的研究提出,对显著项目的自上而下的注意力优先化可能会产生所谓的刺激驱动捕获。为了验证这一观点,基于视觉搜索任务设计了“”。在实验1中,70%的试验中在同一位置呈现一个与任务无关的单独元素框架。目标以随机概率出现在单独元素位置内或其之外。与单独元素捕获现象一致,与非单独元素位置相比,当目标出现在单独元素位置时,参与者识别目标的速度更快。然而,在30%的试验中省略单独元素框架会产生类似的效果;与预期的非单独元素位置相比,当目标出现在预期的单独元素位置时,参与者识别目标的速度更快(“准捕获”效应)。这些结果表明,参与者将注意力分配到了预期的单独元素位置,而不是单独元素本身捕获了注意力。在实验2中,70%的试验中在随机位置呈现相同的与任务无关的颜色单独元素。在所有30%没有单独元素的多色试验中,这个颜色框架显示为非单独元素。与其他框架相比,当目标出现在预期的单独元素颜色框架中时,在没有单独元素的试验和有单独元素的试验中都获得了类似的促进效应。这些结果进一步支持了这样一种观点,即单独元素捕获的实例可以通过自上而下向单独元素的注意力转移来解释。讨论了这些结果的理论意义。主要是,该研究呼吁考虑所有注意力控制源可能由自上而下控制的连续变量表示的可能性,包括“物理显著性”类别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/6bc40088e674/fpsyg-09-00218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/5860da4e078b/fpsyg-09-00218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/4e60072b20b7/fpsyg-09-00218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/47fc8e0e6654/fpsyg-09-00218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/6bc40088e674/fpsyg-09-00218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/5860da4e078b/fpsyg-09-00218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/4e60072b20b7/fpsyg-09-00218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/47fc8e0e6654/fpsyg-09-00218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb46/5863530/6bc40088e674/fpsyg-09-00218-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.突出项目的自上而下优先级排序可能会产生所谓的刺激驱动捕获。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 23;9:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218. eCollection 2018.
2
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.主动抑制显著但无关的感觉输入的直接证据。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1740-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797615597913. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
3
Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.注意捕获取决于任务需求与刺激显著性之间的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Jul;71(5):1015-26. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1015.
4
Irrelevant singletons capture attention: evidence from inhibition of return.无关的单一元素会吸引注意力:来自返回抑制的证据。
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):764-70. doi: 10.3758/bf03194743.
5
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.干扰项基于特征的统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000613.
6
Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.突显度决定视觉选择中的注意定向。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1051-1057. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000796. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Awareness and Stimulus-Driven Spatial Attention as Independent Processes.意识与刺激驱动的空间注意力作为独立过程
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 2;14:352. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00352. eCollection 2020.
8
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.自上而下的空间注意在偶然注意捕获中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.自上而下的聚焦空间注意在预注意显著性编码和基于显著性的注意捕获中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1152-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.视觉搜索中不相关的单一样本不会吸引注意力,但可能会产生非空间过滤成本。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):645-60. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21390. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Dichotomy, Trichotomy, or a Spectrum: Time to Reconsider Attentional Guidance Terminology.二分法、三分法还是一个连续体:是时候重新审视注意力引导术语了。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02243. eCollection 2020.
2
Reply to Theeuwes: Fast Feature-based Top-down Effects, but Saliency May be Slow.对特维斯的回应:基于快速特征的自上而下效应,但显著性可能较慢。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):28. doi: 10.5334/joc.23.
3
Comment on Theeuwes's Characterization of Visual Selection.评特乌韦斯对视觉选择的刻画。

本文引用的文献

1
Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.特征单例独立于特征启动吸引空间注意力。
J Vis. 2017 Aug 1;17(9):7. doi: 10.1167/17.9.7.
2
Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.迈向注意力捕获争议的解决方案。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1772-82. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000118. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
3
Stimulus-driven capture and contingent capture.刺激驱动捕获和依变捕获。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.29.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;1(6):872-881. doi: 10.1002/wcs.83.
4
Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set.奖赏能够调节注意力捕获,且独立于自上而下的定势。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2540-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6.
5
Dangerous animals capture and maintain attention in humans.危险动物会吸引并保持人类的注意力。
Evol Psychol. 2014 May 28;12(3):534-48. doi: 10.1177/147470491401200304.
6
Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection.奖励关联和空间概率对注意力选择产生累加效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Nov;76(8):2315-25. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0720-5.
7
The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing.奖励对外源性线索提示中定向和重新定向的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):635-46. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0278-7.
8
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
9
Rapid detection of visually provocative animals by preschool children and adults.学龄前儿童和成年人对视觉刺激动物的快速检测。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;114(4):522-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
10
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.自上而下与自下而上的注意控制:一个失败的理论二分法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 12.