Benoni Hanna
Department of Psychology, The College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 23;9:218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00218. eCollection 2018.
The current study proposes that top-down attentional prioritization of salient items may produce the so-called stimulus-driven capture. To test this proposal, the "" was designed on the basis of a visual search task. In Experiment 1, a task-irrelevant singleton frame was presented at the same location in 70% of the trials. The target was either presented at chance level within the singleton location, or away from it. In line with the singleton capture phenomenon, participants were faster in identifying the target when it appeared in the singleton location compared to non-singleton locations. However, leaving out the singleton frame in 30% of the trials led to a similar effect; participants were faster in identifying the target when it appeared in the expected singleton location compared to expected non-singletons locations (a "quasi-capture" effect). These results suggest that the participants allocated their attention to the expected singleton location, rather than that the singleton itself captured attention. In Experiment 2, the same task-irrelevant color singleton was presented in a random position in 70% of the trials. This color frame was shown as a non-singleton in all of the 30% singleton-absent multicolored trials. A similar facilitation effect was obtained when the target appeared in the expected singleton color frame compared to other frames, in singleton-absent trials as in singleton-present trials. These results further support the idea that instances of singleton capture can be explained by top-down attentional shifts toward singleton items. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed. Mostly, the study calls to consider the possibility that all sources of attentional control may be represented by a continuous variable of top-down control, including the category of "physical salience."
当前的研究提出,对显著项目的自上而下的注意力优先化可能会产生所谓的刺激驱动捕获。为了验证这一观点,基于视觉搜索任务设计了“”。在实验1中,70%的试验中在同一位置呈现一个与任务无关的单独元素框架。目标以随机概率出现在单独元素位置内或其之外。与单独元素捕获现象一致,与非单独元素位置相比,当目标出现在单独元素位置时,参与者识别目标的速度更快。然而,在30%的试验中省略单独元素框架会产生类似的效果;与预期的非单独元素位置相比,当目标出现在预期的单独元素位置时,参与者识别目标的速度更快(“准捕获”效应)。这些结果表明,参与者将注意力分配到了预期的单独元素位置,而不是单独元素本身捕获了注意力。在实验2中,70%的试验中在随机位置呈现相同的与任务无关的颜色单独元素。在所有30%没有单独元素的多色试验中,这个颜色框架显示为非单独元素。与其他框架相比,当目标出现在预期的单独元素颜色框架中时,在没有单独元素的试验和有单独元素的试验中都获得了类似的促进效应。这些结果进一步支持了这样一种观点,即单独元素捕获的实例可以通过自上而下向单独元素的注意力转移来解释。讨论了这些结果的理论意义。主要是,该研究呼吁考虑所有注意力控制源可能由自上而下控制的连续变量表示的可能性,包括“物理显著性”类别。