Munneke Jaap, Hoppenbrouwers Sylco S, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2540-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0958-6.
The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed "selection history." Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their physical attributes would predict. As such, the value that is associated with certain stimuli modulates attentional capture. This particular influence has also been shown for endogenous attention. Although recent leads have emerged, elucidating the influences of reward on exogenous and endogenous attention, it remains unclear to what extent exogenous attention is modulated by reward when endogenous attention is already deployed. We used a Posner cueing task in which exogenous and endogenous cues were presented to guide attention. Crucially, the exogenous cue also indicated the reward value. That is, the color of the exogenous cue indicated how much reward could be obtained on a given trial. The results showed main effects of endogenous and exogenous attention (i.e., speeded reaction times when either cue was valid, as compared to when it was invalid). Crucially, an interaction between exogenous cue validity and reward level was observed, indicating that reward-based associative-learning processes rapidly influence attentional capture, even when endogenous attention has been actively deployed.
传统上对外源性和内源性注意力控制的区分,最近因一种额外的控制模式(称为“选择历史”)而得到丰富。例如,最近的研究结果表明,先前受到奖励或惩罚的刺激比其物理属性所预测的更能吸引注意力。因此,与某些刺激相关的价值会调节注意力捕获。这种特殊影响在内源性注意力方面也得到了证实。尽管最近已经出现了一些线索,阐明了奖励对外源性和内源性注意力的影响,但当内源性注意力已经被部署时,奖励在多大程度上调节外源性注意力仍不清楚。我们使用了一个波斯纳线索任务,其中呈现外源性和内源性线索来引导注意力。关键的是,外源性线索还表明了奖励价值。也就是说,外源性线索的颜色表明在给定试验中可以获得多少奖励。结果显示了内源性和外源性注意力的主效应(即与无效线索相比,当任何一个线索有效时反应时间加快)。关键的是,观察到外源性线索有效性和奖励水平之间的相互作用,表明基于奖励的联想学习过程即使在内源性注意力已经被积极部署时,也会迅速影响注意力捕获。