• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using a new interrater reliability method to test the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument in home health care.使用一种新的评分者间信度方法来测试家庭医疗保健中改良的奥卢患者分类工具。
Nurs Open. 2018 Feb 4;5(2):167-175. doi: 10.1002/nop2.126. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
Validity and reliability testing of the Oulu patient classification: instrument within primary health care for the older people.奥卢患者分类法的有效性和可靠性测试：老年人初级保健用工具。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2009 Dec;4(4):280-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00175.x. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
3
Oulu Patient Classification instrument within primary health care.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:30-5.
4
[Psychometric properties of Q-DIO, an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes].[Q-DIO的心理测量特性，一种用于测量记录的护理诊断、干预措施及结果质量的工具]
Pflege. 2010 Apr;23(2):119-28. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000024.
5
Using a new interrater reliability method to test the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument in home health care: Common mistakes and methodological issue.运用一种新的评分者间信度方法对家庭医疗保健中改良的奥卢患者分类工具进行测试：常见错误与方法学问题。
Nurs Open. 2019 Aug 8;6(4):1634. doi: 10.1002/nop2.359. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
The transcultural adaptation and the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of Perroca's Patient Classification Instrument.佩罗卡患者分类工具土耳其语版的跨文化调适、效度和信度。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Mar;28(2):259-266. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12916. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Quality of nursing intensity data: inter-rater reliability of the patient classification after two decades in clinical use.护理强度数据质量：经过二十年临床使用后的患者分类的评分者间信度。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2248-2259. doi: 10.1111/jan.13288. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Development of a measurement instrument for nursing documentation in the patient record.用于患者病历护理记录的测量工具的开发。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:297-300.
9
Patient classification systems used to classify nursing intensity and assess nursing staffing resources in home health care: A scoping review.用于分类家庭保健护理强度和评估护理人员配置资源的患者分类系统：范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov;99:103361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 22.
10
Healthcare professionals' views on the mutual consistency of the Finnish Classification of Nursing Interventions and the Oulu Patient Classification.医疗保健专业人员对芬兰护理干预分类与奥卢患者分类相互一致性的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Sep;30(3):477-88. doi: 10.1111/scs.12266. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Food insecurity questionnaire on knowledge, attitudes, and practices for perinatal care professionals.围产期护理专业人员食物不安全知识、态度及行为调查问卷。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328891. eCollection 2025.
2
Using a new interrater reliability method to test the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument in home health care: Common mistakes and methodological issue.运用一种新的评分者间信度方法对家庭医疗保健中改良的奥卢患者分类工具进行测试：常见错误与方法学问题。
Nurs Open. 2019 Aug 8;6(4):1634. doi: 10.1002/nop2.359. eCollection 2019 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Nursing Activities Score in Critical Care Nursing.
J Nurs Meas. 2018 Apr 1;26(1):142-162. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.26.1.142.
2
Quality of nursing intensity data: inter-rater reliability of the patient classification after two decades in clinical use.护理强度数据质量：经过二十年临床使用后的患者分类的评分者间信度。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Sep;73(9):2248-2259. doi: 10.1111/jan.13288. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Hospital mortality and optimality of nursing workload: A study on the predictive validity of the RAFAELA Nursing Intensity and Staffing system.医院死亡率与护理工作量的最优性：关于拉斐拉护理强度与人员配置系统预测效度的研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Aug;60:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
4
Sufficient competence in community elderly care? Results from a competence measurement of nursing staff.社区老年护理是否有足够的能力？护理人员能力测量的结果。
BMC Nurs. 2016 Jan 14;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0124-z. eCollection 2016.
5
Validity and reliability of the Katz-15 scale to measure unfavorable health outcomes in community-dwelling older people.评估社区居住老年人不良健康结局的 Katz-15 量表的有效性和可靠性。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2014 Nov;18(9):848-54. doi: 10.1007/s12603-014-0558-5.
6
Nursing Activities Score and workload in the intensive care unit of a university hospital.某大学医院重症监护病房的护理活动评分与工作量
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Jul-Sep;26(3):292-8. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20140041.
7
The RAFAELA system: a workforce planning tool for nurse staffing and human resource management.拉斐拉系统：一种用于护士人员配置和人力资源管理的劳动力规划工具。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2014 May;21(2):30-6. doi: 10.7748/nm2014.04.21.2.30.e1199.
8
Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study.九个欧洲国家的护士配备和教育与医院死亡率：回顾性观察研究。
Lancet. 2014 May 24;383(9931):1824-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
The effects of RN staffing hours on nursing home quality: a two-stage model.RN staffing hours 对养老院质量的影响：两阶段模型。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
10
Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.临床医生不喜欢 Cohen's κ 是对的。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 12;346:f2125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2125.

使用一种新的评分者间信度方法来测试家庭医疗保健中改良的奥卢患者分类工具。

Using a new interrater reliability method to test the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument in home health care.

作者信息

Flo Jill, Landmark Bjørg, Hatlevik Ove Edward, Fagerström Lisbeth

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences Department of Nursing and Health Sciences University College of Southeast Norway Drammen Norway.

Institute for Research and Development for Nursing and Care Services Drammen Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2018 Feb 4;5(2):167-175. doi: 10.1002/nop2.126. eCollection 2018 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.126
PMID:29599992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867286/
Abstract

AIM

To test the interrater reliability of the modified Oulu Patient Classification instrument, using a multiple parallel classification method based on oral case presentations in home health care in Norway.

DESIGN

Reliability study.

METHODS

Data were collected at two municipal home healthcare units during 2013-2014. The reliability of the modified OPCq instrument was tested using a new multiple parallel classification method. The data material consisted of 2 010 parallel classifications, analysed using consensus in per cent and Cohen's kappa. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency.

RESULTS

For parallel classifications, consensus varied between 64.78-77.61%. Interrater reliability varied between 0.49-0.69 (Cohen's kappa), the internal consistency between 0.81-0.94 (Cronbach's alpha). Analysis of the raw scores showed 27.2% classifications had the same points, 39.1% differed one point, 17.9% differed two points and 16.5% differed ≥3 points.

摘要

目的

采用基于挪威家庭医疗中口腔病例报告的多重平行分类方法，测试改良版奥卢患者分类工具的评分者间信度。

设计

信度研究。

方法

2013年至2014年期间在两个市政家庭医疗单位收集数据。使用一种新的多重平行分类方法测试改良版OPCq工具的信度。数据材料包括2010次平行分类，采用百分比一致性和科恩kappa系数进行分析。使用克朗巴哈系数测量内部一致性。

结果

对于平行分类，一致性在64.78%至77.61%之间。评分者间信度在0.49至0.69之间（科恩kappa系数），内部一致性在0.81至0.94之间（克朗巴哈系数）。原始分数分析显示，27.2%的分类得分相同，39.1%相差1分，17.9%相差2分，16.5%相差≥3分。